Journal is indexed in following databases:
- SCOPUS
- Web of Science Core Collection - Journal Citation Reports
- EBSCOhost
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- TRID Database - Transportation Research Board
- Index Copernicus Journals Master List
- BazTech
- Google Scholar
2023 Journal Impact Factor - 0.7
2023 CiteScore - 1.4
ISSN 2083-6473
ISSN 2083-6481 (electronic version)
Editor-in-Chief
Associate Editor
Prof. Tomasz Neumann
Published by
TransNav, Faculty of Navigation
Gdynia Maritime University
3, John Paul II Avenue
81-345 Gdynia, POLAND
e-mail transnav@umg.edu.pl
Research on the Risk Assessment of Man Overboard in the Performance of Flag Vessel Fleet (FVF)
1 Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China
ABSTRACT: The performance of Flag Vessels impressed the viewers deeply at the opening ceremony of 2010 Shanghai Expo. Safety of the trainees is the key factor being considered by the organizer in the course of trainings, rehearsals and final performance. Complex chevron shape of fleet increased the risk, such as collision, grounding, waves damaging etc., which made it necessary to assess the risk of performers, especially the risk of man overboard. In this paper, Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) method recommended by International Maritime Organization (IMO) was adopted to guarantee/assess the safety of the performers, especially decrease the risk of man overboard. FSA includes five steps in general, which are Hazard Identification (HAZID), Risk Assessment (RA), Risk Control Options (RCOs), Cost Benefit Assessment (CBA) and Recommendations for Decision-Making (RDM) respectively. In this paper, Brainstorming and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) methods were both used in HAZID step. Then the combination of the two indexes was employed to calculate the risk distribution of the fleet in RA step. One is the possibility of man overboard and the other is the consequence once the incident happens. Moreover, several RCOs were provided based on the risk distribution mentioned above. Finally, based on the results of FSA assessment, some suggestions were carried out to decrease the risk of performers according to CBA, like personnel arrangement according to risk degree of different areas in fleet. It has been proved that applying FSA method to the fleet of flag vessels can reduce the overall degree of risk and ensure the success of performance.
KEYWORDS: Risk Assessment, Search and Rescue (SAR), Man Overboard (MOB), Flag Vessel Fleet (FVF), Formal Safety Assessment (FSA), Recommendations for Decision-Making (RDM), Risk Control Option (RCO), Hazard Identification (HAZID)
REFERENCES
IMO, MSC Circ.1023 / MEPC Circ.392. Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment(FSA) for Use in the IMO Rule-Making Process, London, 2002
Shenping Hu, Quangen Fang, Haibo Xia and Yongtao Xi. Formal safety assessment based on relative risks model in ship navigation. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 2007,92(3):369-377
Wang J., Foinikis P. Formal Safety Assessment Of Containerships. Marine Policy, 2001,25 :143-157
Lois P., Wang J., Wall A., Ruxton T.. Formal Safety Assessment of Cruise Ships. Tourism Management, 2004(25): 93–109.
Pillay A., Wang J., Wall A, Ruxton T. Formal Safety Assessment of Fishing Vessels: Risk and Maintenance Modelling. Journal of Marine Engineering and Technology. 2002(1)81-115
QIN Ting-rong, CHEN Wei-jiong; ZENG Xiang-kun. Risk management modeling and its application in maritime safety. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2008,7:286-291
Chen Weijiong, HAO Yuguo. Research on Maritime Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) Methodology. In: WANG Yajun, ed. Progress in Safety Science and Technology: Vol.IV. Beijing: Science Press, 2004:2373-2378
Tingrong Qin, Weijiong Chen, Yuguo Hao, Jianhua Jiang and Chuang Li. Formal Safety Assessment Methodology. China Safety Safety Science Journel. 2005, 15(4):88-92
Citation note:
Qin T.R., Hu Q., Mo J.Y.: Research on the Risk Assessment of Man Overboard in the Performance of Flag Vessel Fleet (FVF). TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 125-130, 2011