Journal is indexed in following databases:
- SCOPUS
- Web of Science Core Collection - Journal Citation Reports
- EBSCOhost
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- TRID Database - Transportation Research Board
- Index Copernicus Journals Master List
- BazTech
- Google Scholar
2023 Journal Impact Factor - 0.7
2023 CiteScore - 1.4
ISSN 2083-6473
ISSN 2083-6481 (electronic version)
Editor-in-Chief
Associate Editor
Prof. Tomasz Neumann
Published by
TransNav, Faculty of Navigation
Gdynia Maritime University
3, John Paul II Avenue
81-345 Gdynia, POLAND
e-mail transnav@umg.edu.pl
Opening of Offshore Oil Business in Mexico and Associated Framework to Cope with Potential Maritime Security Threats
1 World Maritime University, Malmö, Sweden
ABSTRACT: After 75 years of State oil monopoly, Mexico performed the first business oil round in 2015 involving the private sector. This auction-round offered 14 oil exploration fields located on the continental shelf to private companies. The development and exploitation of these hydrocarbon fields faces significant challenges regarding security. The economic loss for theft of hydrocarbons through illegal connections to pipelines is estimated to 973 million, 125 thousand U.S. dollar, only for the year of 2014. While productive research has been made, it has mainly focused on transportation systems and basically, pipelines. The development and establishment of policies prioritizing maritime security and protection of critical offshore infrastructure against theft of hydrocarbons, drugs organizations and terror attacks needs to be included in the national agenda to improve maritime security and mitigate potential security threats at sea, including damage to the marine environment. This could increase the trust of investors and stakeholders and would contribute to the faster development of new exploration and production fields. While the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS Code) is the cornerstone for the construction of the port's security program and establishes the requirements of the Port Facility Security Plan (PFSP), including oil port facilities, it has not been fully implemented in several important Mexican ports. It is concluded that some important ports lack many of the core security processes, procedures and controls that should be included in any PFSP. This article briefly reviews the situation of the oil industry from a security perspective and discusses key elements of maritime security; addressing the necessity of the inclusion of maritime security and protection of critical oil infrastructure offshore in the national agenda that would provide for future research directions in the maritime security domain and contribute to the establishment of a national maritime security policy.
KEYWORDS: Maritime Security, ISPS Code, Offshore Technology, Offshore Oil Business, Critical Offshore Infrastructure, Port Facility Security Plan (PFSP), Port’s Security Program, Mexican Ports
REFERENCES
Avila, A. Z. (2008). Towards a Cross-Border Unitization Agreement Between Mexico & Usa for the Exploitation of the Common Oil Reserves in the Gulf of Mexico. Oslo: University of Oslo.
Comisión Nacional de Hidrocarburos. (2015, Julio-Septiembre). Primera Licitación de la Ronda 1. Comisión Nacional de Hidrocarburos(004), 4-6.
Cámara de Diputados del Honorable Congreso de la Unión, L. L.-g. (2014, September 14th.). Versión estenográfica de las comparecencias del secretario de Energia, licenciado Pedro Joaquín Coldwell, y del director general de Petróleos Mexicanos, maestro Emilio Lozoya Austin ante la Comisión de Energía, viernes 19 de septiembre de 2014. Hentet December 9th., 2015 fra http://cronica.diputados.gob.mx/Ve19sep2014-Energia.html
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, G. e. (Series 2014-2015). Índice de Precios. Hentet December 10th, 2015 fra http://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/bie/?idserPadre=11000470#D11000470
Pemex unidad de enlace a travez del Instituto Nacional de Transparencia, A. a. (2015). SISI12857200255215. Mexico City.
Pemex unidad de enlace a travez del Instituto Nacional de Transparencia, A. a. (2015). SISI1857200171515. Mexico City.
Piètre-Cambacédès, L., & Bouissou, M. (2013, February). Cross-fertilization between safety and security engineering. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, ss. 110-126.
Klein, N. R., & Mossop, J. (2009). Maritime Security : International Law and Policy Perspectives from Australia and New Zealand. London: Routledge.
Vaggelas, G. K., & Ng, A. K. (2012). CH 33. Port Security: The ISPS Code. I I. W. Talley, The Blackwell Companion to Maritime Economics (ss. 674-700). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Weintrit, A. (2009). Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation. CRC Press.
International Maritime Organization. (1974). International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea. Hentet December 10th., 2015 fra http://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/ListOfConventions/Pages/International-Convention-for-the-Safety-of-Life-at-Sea-(SOLAS),-1974.aspx
Kenneth, C. (2009). Port Security Management . Boca Raton Fl, USA: Auerbach Publications.
Zhang, D., Payam, D., & Ekwall, D. (2011). How robustness and resilience support security business against antagonistic threats in transport network. Journal of Transportation Security, ss. 201-219.
Espin-Digon, J., Burns-Herbert, & Bateman, S. R. (2008). Lloyd's MIU Handbook of Maritime Security. Auerbach Publications.
International Maritime Organization. (2012). Guide to Maritime Security and the ISPS Code. London: IMO Publishing.
Citation note:
Ávila-Zúñiga-Nordfjeld A., Dalaklis D.: Opening of Offshore Oil Business in Mexico and Associated Framework to Cope with Potential Maritime Security Threats. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 12, No. 1, doi:10.12716/1001.12.01.20, pp. 173-179, 2018
Authors in other databases:
Adriana Ávila-Zúñiga-Nordfjeld: