Journal is indexed in following databases:
- SCOPUS
- Web of Science Core Collection - Journal Citation Reports
- EBSCOhost
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- TRID Database - Transportation Research Board
- Index Copernicus Journals Master List
- BazTech
- Google Scholar
2023 Journal Impact Factor - 0.7
2023 CiteScore - 1.4
ISSN 2083-6473
ISSN 2083-6481 (electronic version)
Editor-in-Chief
Associate Editor
Prof. Tomasz Neumann
Published by
TransNav, Faculty of Navigation
Gdynia Maritime University
3, John Paul II Avenue
81-345 Gdynia, POLAND
e-mail transnav@umg.edu.pl
Effectiveness of Problem-based Learning (PBL) on Maritime Courses in a Blended Learning Modality
1 John B. Lacson Foundation Maritime University, Iloilo City, Philippines
ABSTRACT: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) on identified courses in improving the performance of maritime students. This study utilized pretest-posttest non-equivalent group design. Respondents were 480 BSMT students gathered using a match group design. Instrument used was a 45-item researcher-made multiple-choice test that has undergone content validity and reliability testing. Statistical tools used were mean and standard deviation for descriptive data analysis, Mann-Whitney test and Wilcoxon-Signed ranks for inferential data analysis, and Cohen’s d effect size, to determine the effectiveness of PBL. Results showed that the experimental and control group pretest performance before the intervention is described as poor and fair, while excellent and very good thereafter. No significant difference in the pretest scores of experimental and control groups. No significant differences in the posttest scores of experimental and control groups in NGEC 9, NAV 5, and SEAM 6, while there were significant differences in the posttest scores of experimental and control groups in NAV 2, NAV 4, and NAV 7. Significant differences were noted in the pretest and posttest scores of the experimental and control groups in all identified courses. The mean gain score of the experimental group in all identified courses is higher than the control group. No significant difference in the mean gains of experimental and control groups, for NGEC 9, NAV 5, and for SEAM 6 but significantly different was noted in NAV 2, NAV 4, and NAV 7. Based on the effect size results, PBL is highly effective on NAV 2 and NAV 7 compared to the traditional method. These results confirm how effective the PBL approach is as a teaching style in all identified courses. PBL approach is highly recommended for all maritime courses.
KEYWORDS: Maritime Education and Training (MET), Data Analysis, Maritime Safety Education, Education of Navigators, Blended Learning, e-Learning Course, Problem-based Learning (PBL), General Education and Maritime Professional Courses
REFERENCES
Manuel, M. E. (2017). Vocational and academic approaches to maritime education and training (MET): Trends, challenges and opportunities. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16, 473-483. - doi:10.1007/s13437-017-0130-3
Rowihil, M. S., & BA Farag, Y. (2021). Sustainable Development in Maritime Education and Training; Trends, Challenges and the Way Forward. https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/77215/1/Rowihil_Farag_MSR_2021_Sustainable_development_in_maritime_education_and_training.pdf
Akl, A. (2014). Problem based learning (PBL) in teacher education: A review of the effect of PBL on pre-service teachers' knowledge and skills. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 7-18.
Demirel, E. (2020). Maritime education and training in the digital era. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(9), 4129-4142. http://doi.org/ 10.13189/ujer.2020.080939 - doi:10.13189/ujer.2020.080939
Park, E. L., & Choi, B. K. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: Traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges. Higher Education, 68, 749-771. - doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9742-0
Sadeghi, M. (2019). A shift from classroom to distance learning: Advantages and limitations. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(1), 80-88. - doi:10.29252/ijree.4.1.80
Chua, B. L., Tan, O. S., & Liu, W. C. (2016). Journey into the problem-solving process: cognitive functions in a PBL environment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(2), 191-202. - doi:10.1080/14703297.2014.961502
Arseven, Z., Sahin, S., & Kiliç, A. (2016). Teachers' adoptation level of student centered education approach. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(29), 133-144.
Yew, E., & Goh, K. (2016). Problem-based learning: An overview of its process and impact on learning. Health Professions, 2(2), 75-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004 - doi:10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004
Efendioglu, A. (2015). Problem-based learning environment in basic computer course: Pre-service teachers achievement and key factors for learning. Journal of International Education Research, 11(3), 205-216. - doi:10.19030/jier.v11i3.9372
Ageorges, P., Bacila, A., Poutot, G., & Blandin, B. (2014). Some lessons from a 3-year experiment of problem-based learning in physics in a French school of engineering. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(8), 564–567. - doi:10.12691/education-2-8-1
Temel, S. (2014). The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service teachers' critical thinking dispositions and perceptions of problem-solving ability. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), 1– 20. - doi:10.15700/201412120936
Hung, W. (2016). All PBL starts here: The problem. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 10(2), 1-10. - doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1604
Alrahlah, A. (2016). How effective the problem-based learning (PBL) in dental education. A critical review. The Saudi Dental Journal, 28(4), 155-161. - doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2016.08.003
Albanese, M. A., & Dast, L. C. (2013). Problem‐based Learning. Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice, 61-79. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118472361.ch5 - doi:10.1002/9781118472361.ch5
Prosser, M., & Sze, D. (2014). Problem-based learning: Student learning experiences and outcomes. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 28(1-2), 131-142. - doi:10.3109/02699206.2013.820351
Silva, A. B. D., Bispo, A. C. K. d. A., Rodriguez, D. G., & Vasquez, F. I. F. (2018). Problem-based learning: A proposal for structuring PBL and its implications for learning among students in an undergraduate management degree program. Revista de Gestão, 25 (2), 160-177. - doi:10.1108/REGE-03-2018-030
Yennita, Y., & Zukmadini, A. Y. (2021). Problem-based learning (PBL) and blended learning in improving critical thinking skills and student learning activities in biochemistry courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1731, 1-6. - doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1731/1/012007
Zamroni, E., Muslihati, Lasan, B. B., & Hidayah, N. (2020, May). Blended learning based on problem based learning to improve critical thinking ability of prospective counselors. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1539, 1-8. - doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1539/1/012039
Vidergor, H. E., & Krupnik-Gottlieb, M. (2015). High order thinking, problem based and project based learning in blended learning environments. In H. E. Vidergor and C. R. Harris (Eds.), Applied Practice for educators of gifted and able learners (pp. 217-232). - doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-004-8_11
de Jong, N., Savin-Baden, M., Cunningham, A. M., & Verstegen, D. M. (2014). Blended learning in health education: Three case studies. Perspectives on medical education, 3, 278-288. - doi:10.1007/S40037-014-0108-1
Clark, K. R. (2018). Learning theories: Constructivism. Radiologic Technology, 90(2), 180-182.
Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70.
Mann, K., & MacLeod, A. (2015). Constructivism: Learning theories and approaches to research. In J. Cleland and S. J. Durning (Eds.), Researching Medical Education (pp. 51-65). https://edc.mrgums.ac.ir/Uploads/User/ 4614/Researching%20Medical%20Education%20by%20Jennifer%20Cleland%2C%20Steven%20J.%20Durning%20(z-lib.org).pdf#page=75 - doi:10.1002/9781118838983.ch6
Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice. Teachers College Press. https://books.google.com.ph/books?hl=en&l r=&id=pIbAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT9&dq=theory+of+constructivism&ots=tyRaURrxyC&sig=p6AvetVJFP9uABS2U11ZjflB9Ac&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=theory%20of%20constructivism&f=false
Bryant, F. B., Kastrup, H., Udo, M., Hislop, N., Shefner, R., & Mallow, J. (2013). Science anxiety, science attitudes, and constructivism: A binational study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 432-448. - doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9404-x
Ayaz, M. F., & Sekerci, H. (2015). The effects of the constructivist learning approach on student's academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 143-156.
Al-Huneidi, A., & Schreurs, J. (2013). Constructivism based blended learning in higher education. In Information Systems, E-learning, and Knowledge Management Research: 4th World Summit on the Knowledge Society, WSKS 2011, Mykonos, Greece, September 21-23, 2011. Revised Selected Papers 4 (pp. 581-591). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Assuah, C. K., Mantey, G. K., & Osei, L. (2022). The effect of think-pair-share learning on junior high school students’ achievement in algebraic expressions: Pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 20(2), 46-55. - doi:10.9734/ajpas/2022/v20i2418
Sivakumar, P., & Selvakumar, S. (2019). Blended learning package: It‘s effectiveness on students’ performance and retention in higher secondary physics course, International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(10), 1316-1320.
Ibrahim, N. K., Banjar, S., Al-Ghamdi, A., Al-Darmasi, M., Khoja, A., Turkistani, J., Arif, R., Al-Sebyani, A., Musawa, A. A., & Basfar, W. (2014). Medical students’ preference of problem-based learning or traditional lectures in King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 34(2), 128-133. - doi:10.5144/0256-4947.2014.128
Sadhasivam, M., D’cruz, S., & Anandarajan, B. (2013). Introduction of pre-test and post-test enhances attentiveness to physiology lectures-students. International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research, 4 (5), 341-344.
Oderinu, O. H., Adegbulugbe, I. C., Orenuga, O. O., & Butali, A. (2019). Comparison of students' perception of problem‐based learning and traditional teaching method in a Nigerian dental school. European Journal of Dental Education, 24(2), 207-212. - doi:10.1111/eje.12486
Moazami, F., Bahrampour, E., Azar, M. R., Jahedi, F., & Moattari, M. (2014). Comparing two methods of education (virtual versus traditional) on learning of Iranian dental students: A post-test only design study. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 1-5. - doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-45
Delucchi, M. (2014). Measuring student learning in social statistics: A pretest-posttest study of knowledge gain. Teaching Sociology, 42(3), 231-239. - doi:10.1177/0092055X14527909
Shin, D., Park, Y., & Kim, D. H. (2017). A study on the effects of ARPA/Radar simulation training. Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment and Safety, 23(3), 294-300. - doi:10.7837/kosomes.2017.23.3.294
Śniegocki, H. (2014). Impact of the Usage of Visual Simulator on the Students Training Results. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Henryk-Sniegocki/publication/262587739_Impact_of_the_usage_of_visual_simulator_on_the_students_training_results/links/5443bcc30cf2a6a049ab02e2/Impact-of-the-usage-of-visual-simulator-on-the-students-training-results.pdf
Laurens, T., Batlolona, F. A., Batlolona, J. R., & Leasa, M. (2017). How does realistic mathematics education (RME) improve students’ mathematics cognitive achievement? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 569-578. - doi:10.12973/ejmste/76959
Mustaffa, N., Ismail, Z., Tasir, Z., & Said, M. N. H. M. (2016). The impacts of implementing problem-based learning (PBL) in mathematics: A review of literature. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(12), 490-503. - doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i12/2513
Zhou, Z. (2018). An empirical study on the influence of PBL teaching model on college students' critical thinking ability. English Language Teaching, 11(4), 15-20. - doi:10.5539/elt.v11n4p15
Preeti, B., Ashish, A., & Shriram, G. (2013). Problem based learning (PBL)-an effective approach to improve learning outcomes in medical teaching. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 7(12), 2896-2897.
Carson, C. (2012). The Effective Use of Effect Size Indices in Institutional Research. http://www.keene.edu/ir/effect_size.pdf.
Bartolucci, A. A., Tendera, M., & Howard, G. (2011). Meta-analysis of multiple primary prevention trials of cardiovascular events using aspirin. The American Journal of Cardiology, 107(12), 1796-1801. - doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.02.325
Citation note:
Germo R.R., Tan V.S., Casañare A.F.: Effectiveness of Problem-based Learning (PBL) on Maritime Courses in a Blended Learning Modality. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 18, No. 3, doi:10.12716/1001.18.03.19, pp. 649-655, 2024
Other publications of authors:
File downloaded 105 times
