Journal is indexed in following databases:
- SCOPUS
- Web of Science Core Collection - Journal Citation Reports
- EBSCOhost
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- TRID Database - Transportation Research Board
- Index Copernicus Journals Master List
- BazTech
- Google Scholar
2023 Journal Impact Factor - 0.7
2023 CiteScore - 1.4
ISSN 2083-6473
ISSN 2083-6481 (electronic version)
Editor-in-Chief
Associate Editor
Prof. Tomasz Neumann
Published by
TransNav, Faculty of Navigation
Gdynia Maritime University
3, John Paul II Avenue
81-345 Gdynia, POLAND
e-mail transnav@umg.edu.pl
Stakeholder Satisfaction: Research Evaluation of Marine Engineering Cadets' Performance at Maritime University, Philippines
1 John B. Lacson Foundation Maritime University, Iloilo City, Philippines
ABSTRACT: This study was conducted to determine the level of stakeholder satisfaction and gather qualitative views and ideas among twenty five (25) company partners - - crew managers, personnel managers, training directors of the different shipping companies based in Manila, Philippines. These company-partners are directly involved in the evaluation of performance of marine engineering cadets, specifically of the Marine Engineering Department, John B. Lacson Foundation Maritime University-Molo, Iloilo City. The Performance Prism (PP) Theory was used in this study as theoretical framework to measure stakeholder satisfaction of different company partners. This is an innovative performance measurement and performance management framework of the second generation. Employing quantitative-qualitative method of analyzing the obtained data, the study entailed three phases, namely: (1) survey personally administered by the researchers, (2) the personal interview with the stakeholders, and (3) analysis of the results of the survey using descriptive statistical methods such as the mean, frequency count, and percentage. The information gathered through the interviews was used to validate the results by quantitative data analysis. The data-gathering instrument was the ?Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey.? Quantitative results revealed that the stakeholder satisfaction level was ?moderately high? among marine engineering cadets in terms of communication, professionalism and trustworthiness, communication, discipline, loyalty, consistency of performance, leadership skills, honesty, industry, social responsibility, and initiative to be satisfactory. The different comments, remarks, suggestions, and responses derived from the interviews were used also in the study as qualitative data to enhance and validate the quantitative data. Furthermore, the qualitative views of the respondents were used to suggest some improvements and innovations in the learning process at Marine Engineering Department of Maritime University (JBLFMU-Molo, Iloilo City), Philippines.
KEYWORDS: Maritime Education and Training (MET), MET System in the Philippines, Crewing, Marine Engineering, Stakeholder Satisfaction, Marine Engineering Cadets, Personnel Manager, Crew Resource Management (CRM)
REFERENCES
Australian Quality Council. (2002). Australian Business, Excellence Framework 2002, AQC, Sydney.
Bayley, S. (2001). ‘Measuring customer satisfaction: comparing traditional and latent trait approaches using the Auditor-General’s client survey’, Evaluation Journal of Australasia, vol. 1, no. 1, March 2001, pp. 8–18.
Brooks, M., Milne, C., and Johansson, K. (2002). Using Stakeholder Research in the Evaluation of Organizational Performance.
CranfieldUniversity. (http://www.12manage.com/methods_performance_prism.httml).
Chennell, A.F. et al. (2000). ‘OPM: a system for organizational performance measurement’, Proceedings of Performance Measurement: Past, Present and Future, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 19–21 July.
Commonwealth Department of Finance and Administration (2000). The Outcomes & Outputs Framework: Guidance Document, Canberra, November.
Fletcher, A., J. Guthrie, P. Steane, G. Roos and S Pike. (2003). Mapping stakeholder perceptions for a third sector organization. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(4): 505 – 527.
Kaplan, R. & Norton, D. ( 1996). The Balanced Scorecard: translating strategy into action, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle, and D.J. Wood. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What really Counts. Academy of Management Review 22(4): 853 - 888.
Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park,CA: Sage.
Savage, G. T., T. W. Nix, Whitehead and Blair. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive 5(2): 61 – 75
Citation note:
Alimen R.A., Gayo Jr. M., Jaleco V.B.: Stakeholder Satisfaction: Research Evaluation of Marine Engineering Cadets' Performance at Maritime University, Philippines. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 345-350, 2010