Journal is indexed in following databases:
- SCOPUS
- Web of Science Core Collection - Journal Citation Reports
- EBSCOhost
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- TRID Database - Transportation Research Board
- Index Copernicus Journals Master List
- BazTech
- Google Scholar
2023 Journal Impact Factor - 0.7
2023 CiteScore - 1.4
ISSN 2083-6473
ISSN 2083-6481 (electronic version)
Editor-in-Chief
Associate Editor
Prof. Tomasz Neumann
Published by
TransNav, Faculty of Navigation
Gdynia Maritime University
3, John Paul II Avenue
81-345 Gdynia, POLAND
e-mail transnav@umg.edu.pl
Cognitive Task Analysis to Understand Icebreaker Decision Making
1 Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
2 Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John’s, Canada
3 University of South-Eastern Norway, Borre, Norway
2 Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John’s, Canada
3 University of South-Eastern Norway, Borre, Norway
ABSTRACT: Icebreakers are a critical shared resource between Finland and Sweden required to keep the Baltic Sea clear for differing waterborne activities throughout the winter season. The safety and efficiency (both ecological and in terms of time) of the winter transport system is highly dependent on the decision-making process followed by the icebreakers. The captains in charge of the icebreakers must decide the priority of assistance among all the merchant vessels that may be in need within a given time window. While captains successfully do this every year, with experience, this decision-making becomes second nature and a transparent picture of how the decisions are made is often missing. It is not always clear what salient features captains pay attention to, and how they use those features in their reasoning process to reach a decision during operations. This paper presents a pilot study that uses cognitive task analysis (CTA) to outline captains' decision-making process for ice breaker assistance allocation. In-depth interviews of three subject matter experts were conducted using a naturalistic icebreaker scenario. Results include identified critical decision points, identified, and prioritized salient features, and characterized icebreaker assistance strategies.
KEYWORDS: Baltic Winter Navigation, Critical Decision Method (CDM), Icebreaker Decision Making, Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA), Winter navigation simulation, Priority of Icebreaker Assistance, Icebreaker Assistance Strategies, Finnish-Swedish winter navigation system
REFERENCES
https://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi, “Ice conditions,” Finnish Meteorological Institute. https://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi (accessed Mar. 31, 2023).
Rosenbland, M., 2007. Increasing the Safety of Icebound Shipping, Final Scientific Report: Volume 1, Helsinki Uni-versity of Technology, Ship Laboratory, Espoo, Finland. WP4. Operative Environment (Icebreaker Operations).
Baltic Icebreaking Management, 2021. Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2020-2021. https://baltice.org/app/static/pdf/BIM%20Report%202020-2021.pdf.
Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency, 2021. Finland’s winter navigation. Instructions for winter navigation operators. Helsinki.
Kondratenko, A. et. al. Decarbonizing shipping in ice by intelligent icebreaking assistance: a case study of the Finnish-Swedish winter navigation system (manuscript ready for submission)
K. Kulkarni, P. Kujala, M. Musharraf, and I. Rainio, “Simulation Tool for Winter Navigation Decision Support in the Baltic Sea,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 15, p. 7568, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12157568. - doi:10.3390/app12157568
Crandall, B., Klein, G. A., & Hoffman, R. R. (2006). Working minds: A practitioner's guide to cognitive task analysis. Mit Press. - doi:10.7551/mitpress/7304.001.0001
Schraagen, J. M., Chipman, S. F. & Shalin, V. L. (2000). Cognitive Task Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. - doi:10.4324/9781410605795
Stanton, N., Salmon, P. M., & Rafferty, L. A. (2013). Human factors methods: a practical guide for engineering and design. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Klein, G. A., Calderwood, R. & Macgregor, D. (1989). Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, 19(3), 462-472. - doi:10.1109/21.31053
Klein, G., & Armstrong, A. A. (2004). Critical decision method. In Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods (pp. 373-382). CRC Press. - doi:10.1201/9780203489925.ch35
Hoffman, R. R., Crandall, B. & Shadbolt, N. (1998). Use of the critical decision method to elicit expert knowledge: A case study in the methodology of cognitive task analysis. Human factors, 40(2), 254-276. - doi:10.1518/001872098779480442
https://www.marinevesseltraffic.com/2013/06/mmsi-number-search.html (accessed Mar. 31, 2023).
Ice data: https://www.smhi.se/oceanografi/istjanst/ havsis_en.php (accessed Mar. 31, 2023).
Citation note:
Musharraf M., Kulkarni K., Mallam S.: Cognitive Task Analysis to Understand Icebreaker Decision Making. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 17, No. 4, doi:10.12716/1001.17.04.14, pp. 881-886, 2023
Authors in other databases: