102
of its roof design. In this paper it assumed that area of
PV array takes 70% of the overall surface (S=Length x
Width) of the vessel. For the calculation, SunPower’s
panel SPR-X21-345 is taken into consideration. The
area of one panel is 1.63 m
2
and its nominal power is
345 W (SunPower). Yearly average solar radiation
intensity for area of Kaštela is 1650 [(kWh/m
2
)/year]
(Fig. 13).
Coefficients from Equation 1: k
1=0.9; k2=0.9;
k
3=0.95; k4=0.95. In Table 8 the average solar energy
production for “BB Green Airi El” and “Future of the
Fjords” is shown.
Table 8. Solar energy production
_______________________________________________
S 70% S No. of E Eday (Batt.
[m
2
] [m
2
] panels
capacity/Eday)
[%]
_______________________________________________
A 120 84 51 21229 58 14.5
B 630 441 270 112357 308 17.1
_______________________________________________
A= “BB Green Airi El”; B= “Future of the Fjords”
5.1 Energy consumption and economics
Table 9 shows the estimation of total energy
consumption of “BB Green Airi El” and “Future of the
Fjords” for one crossing. Total energy consumption is
the sum of the propulsion motors and the other loads
consumption (Krčum et al., 2018). For this calculation
the assumption is that 20% of total battery capacity is
consumed by other loads.
Table 9. Energy consumption
_______________________________________________
Cruising Split – Crossing Consumption [kWh]
Speed Resnik time
[knots] [NM] [min] Propulsion Other Total
Loads
_______________________________________________
A 30 7.3 15 152.5 80 232.5
B 16 7.3 27.6 414 360 774
_______________________________________________
A= “BB Green Airi El”; B= “Future of the Fjords”
With 20% assumption for other loads, from Table 9
it can be seen that “BB Green Airi El” needs charging
at both docks (one charge for one crossing). “Future of
the Fjords” needs charging at one dock (one charge
every two crossings).
The number of crossings is taken with assumption
that 30 minutes is enough time to recharge the
batteries for next one or two crossings. The number of
crossing along with number of seats gives the
maximum number of passengers per day (Table 10).
Also, it gives daily energy consumption. For basic
economic analysis, maximum number of passengers
per day along with the price of the one-way ticket is
the income. Total energy consumption is the item of
the expense calculation.
Table 10. Basic economic indicators for summer season
_______________________________________________
June 1
st
– No. Max. no. Total energy
September 30
th
of of consumption
No. of seats passengers per day
crossings per day [MWh]
_______________________________________________
“BB Green 20 70 1400 4.65
Airi El”
“Future of 16 400 6400 12.4
the Fjords”
_______________________________________________
6 CONCLUSION
With growing tourist sector, there is an increase in
road traffic between Split and the airport. The area
between Split and the airport, city of Kaštela,
experiences increase in air pollution. In this paper the
alternative path is proposed with the purpose to
decrease the road traffic and Split center congestion.
Marine traffic on this relation is not new but there are
no organized transfers for larger number of
passengers with economically eligible ticket prices.
From May 1
st
2019. The first organized transfers by
diesel catamaran will start with operation. To fully
exclude the air pollution from marine traffic, in this
paper the electric vessels are investigated. Overall
seven vessels are presented in the paper. To compete
with road traffic and new catamaran line the
minimum cruising speed of the electric vessel is set to
be 13 knots. From presented vessels two of them
satisfy this speed value. These vessels are two very
different vessels. They differ in cruising speed,
installed battery capacity, propulsion power, overall
dimensions and number of seats.
The conclusion itself is that there are commercially
available electric vessels for the rout Split – airport
(Resnik) with minimum cruising speed of 13 knots.
But the question is, are these vessels along with the
service they provide cost effective.
Depending on the energy consumption and
battery capacity there can be one charging station or
two charging stations. One charging station means
lower infrastructure costs and lower maintenance cost
but in the case of malfunctioning there is no backup
supply except if there are battery pack at the station.
The cruising speed, number of crossings, energy
consumption, number of seats, one or two charging
stations, charging stations with or without battery
pack are all items that should be taken into
consideration to optimize the vessel for the route Split
– airport (Resnik). Which in the end leads to another
conclusion that custom solution may be needed.
Economic cost-effectiveness of this proposal will
be subject of our future work.
REFERENCES
[1] BB Green - The world’s fastest electric commuter
vessel. Available at: http://www.bbgreen.info/
[2] B/F Sjövägen. Available at:
http://www.faktaomfartyg.se/sjovagen_2014.htm
[3] Catamaran line d.o.o. Split. Available at:
https://catamaran-line.hr/eng/fleet/