830
Lloyd’sRegister‐7levelsofautonomy,
BureauVeritas‐5levelsofautonomy,
Muninproject‐4levelsofautonomy,[1]
whichtakeintoaccounttheappliedtechnologiesand
operatingproceduresfromthezerolevel(statusquo)
wheretherearemanmadedecisionsandwherethey
perform all operational
and control tasks, to full
autonomy,wheredecisionsandactionsaredevoidof
humansupervision.
Theintermediateformsandlevelsofautonomyof
the ship are determined by the role inthe decisions
andchoicesofhumanactioninthecontroloftheship.
In the projects of unmanned and
autonomous
vessels,thescopeofactivitiesoflandcentersremains
openin termsof monitoring ship transport with the
possibility of interfering with the control process
duringthetasks.
Itshouldbeemphasizedthatthereisaconsensus
on the extension of the scope of tasks of the land
center,which
ispresentedbytheRolls‐Roycestudy.
Taking into consideration the research studies,
theyhavealreadygonebeyondthelevelandscopeof
projects.Inthenearestfuturetheresultoftheseworks
willbethefollowing:
Kongsbergautonomouselectriccontainershipfor
coastalshipping(knowntomefrom
purchasesfor
AM in Szczecin when visiting a design and
executivecenter)
autonomousvessel‐smallpassengerferry(Rolls‐
Royce)intheportofTrondheim(Norway).[1]
Accepting this information I am humbled by the
boldness of the constructors, the power of scientific
thoughtandtechnologicalsolutionsthatprecedelegal
provisions
related to the construction and operation
ofunmannedand/orautonomousships.
I am assuming IMO role, which should already
proceed to the elaboration of legal acts for the
discussedshipsatvariouslevelsofautonomyandthe
nearfuturefullyautonomousones.
Already existing legal documents are not
useful
fortheaboveSolutions,neitherSOLASInternational
ConventionontheSafetyofLifeatSea,norCOLERG‐
containingprovisionsforthepreventionofcollisions
at sea or STCW‐International Convention on
Standards of Training, Certification and
Watchkeepingforseafarersoreventhe International
MARPOLConvention‐theInternationalConvention
for the
Prevention of Pollution from Ships or SAR‐
theInternationalConventiononMaritimeSearchand
Rescue.
I feel challenge for dozens of committees and
subcommittees which are going to create working
groups, and at a record pace ahead of plans build
programsfordesignofficesandshipyards.
Youdonotneed
tohaveauniqueimaginationto
see from the changes that occur to be aware of the
needtotakeimmediateactionregardingtheabove.
And now maritime education. What plans,
educationalprogramsandcurriculashouldbeframed
for new development conditions in the construction
andoperationofsea‐goingvessels.
Beforetheimplementationofthetransitionphases
mentioned above (2020, 2025, 2030) and the
completion of projects planned for 2035 [1] takes
place, the new graduate of the Maritime University
willbeunder50,fullofknowledgeandprofessional
experience.
The reduction of the crew ‘introduced for
autonomous ships will
be preceded by the
introductionofuseofremotelycontrolledvesselsand
autonomous ships under human supervision with a
reducednumberofcrew(skeleton)ʹ[1].Itstemsfrom
anumberofconditions,includingthepreparationof
teachingaids thatensurethesafetyofnavigationand
security,repairandmaintenanceofship
systems.
Plans and curricula should take into account the
presented levels of autonomy, the resulting ranges
andrequirementsforthem.
You can predict based on the above Projects and
levelsofvariousstudieswhatknowledgeandskillsa
graduate of a maritime university should possess
accordingtonewIMOregulations.
You cannot oversleep because the demand for
sucheducatedstaffwillbeexceptional.
Idonotthinkmyimaginationisrunningwild.So
far,mypredictionshavebeeneffective,i.e.regarding
thedevelopmentofmaritimeuniversitiesinPoland.
Irealized the difficulties with both tasks, equally
inIMOaswellas
inmaritimeeducation.
In foreseeable future artificial intelligence will
arise.Itslaunchisthebeginningofanewexistencein
which people will coexist with an unknown
intelligentspecies,whichinaddition developsfaster
thanwedo.
Man has never been in such situation. We have
always been brighter. It
carries great opportunities,
butalsofears:therefore,goodandbadsituations.
We do not know who will control their
independentactionsandifwewillbeabletocontrol
thematall,andifso,whatitisgoingtolooklike.
Is it possible to exercise control over something
that
ismoreintelligentthanweare?
Howcanweprotectourselvesfromevil?
Do we realize that after the machine learning
process,thereisachancethatwewillfindawayto
understandhowthebrainworks?
Currently, we are focused on the application of
artificial intelligence to rationality,
onʺthe ability to
reproduce the complex components of our
intelligence,thatislogicalthinking,decisionmaking,
symbol processing, but there are also many pieces
thatwedoperceiveʺ.[2]
Wehavenoabilitytocomprehendthecomparison
ofhumansensationbyrobotsensors.Buttheproblem
isnot the
computing power. Deep machine learning
allowsyoutogetresultsuptoacertainlevel.Itlacks
knowledgeofthe structureof thehumanbrain,ʺthe
abilitytounderstandandrejectbodilyintelligence,so
much developed in manʺ [2]. So far, artificial
intelligenceanditscomponentshavebeenfocusedon
high rationality as an electronic calculator for
commercialneeds.