
191
larger distances is mostly a matter of a more
powerfultransmitter,itisreasonabletoassume
wide area GNSS jamming by terrorists is a
threat.
3 LocalScaleThreats
Industrial Accidents/Unintentional
Transmissions – US Navy technicians have
twice disrupted GNSS reception in parts of
cities through accidental transmissions.
Sparking
elevators and other electrical
equipmenthavealsobeenfoundtobesources
ofdisruption.
Easily Obtained Illegal Tactical Jamming
Devices – Jamming devices that are effective
fromahundredmeterstotensofkilometersare
easily obtained from any number of vendors
via the internet. Users and possible users
include:
Criminal Enterprises – The US Federal
Bureau of Investigation has published a
notice about use of jamming devices for
theftofhigh value cargo. Similarproblems
have been documented in the UK and
Europe
PrivacySeekingCitizens–Numerouscases
have been documented of telephone and
airportlanding
systemsbeingdisruptedby
“personalprivacydevice”jammersusedby
citizens seeking to avoid surveillance by
employers and others. One small scale
sampling in theUnited States showed 25%
to30%oftrucksinaportareacarryingsuch
devices.Lastyear cranes in aUS container
port were idled
for hours because of
jammingbysuchadevice.
TerroristForces–Lowerpowerdevicescan
also serve the tactical needs of terrorist
organizations. Terrorists have been
apprehendedwithjammingdevicesintheir
possession.
LegalTacticalJammingDevices–Special law
enforcementunitsthatprotectpoliticalleaders
andpolice
SpecialWeaponsandTacticsTeams
are reported to have the ability to jam GNSS
reception over limited distances as part of
their operations. The US military is also
investigating equipping foot soldiers with
devices that wouldalso jamGNSS for use to
prevent improvised explosive devices from
beingtriggered.
Spoofing Devices – Perhaps of even greater
concern are spoofing devices that introduce
hazardously misleading information into
GNSS timing and navigation receivers.
Beginningwithasignalstrengthlessthanthat
of satellite signals, these devices gradually
increase in signal strength until it is slightly
greater and has “captured” the targeted
device.
Previously difficult and expensive to
construct,anexhibitoratahackersconvention
in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA in 2015
demonstrated and published steps for
building a spoofing device from easily
obtained materials. In fact, she sold kits for
spoofersforaround$300.
13 ELORANASAJAMMINGAND
INTERFERENCEMITIGATION
TOOL
The United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia, Russia, China
andSouthKoreaalloperatesomeversionofLoranas
aterrestrialcomplementandbackupforGNSS.Even
thoughtheUnitedStatesshutdownitsLoransystem
in 2010, it has committed to establishing an eLoran
timing system while it develops requirements for
a
largersystemwhichwillalsoprovidepositioning and
navigation[RNTFoundation2015].
Loran/eLoran is a tower‐based hyperbolic
navigation system that is generally effective within
800km of the transmitter, though the range is much
greateroversaltwater.Thesystemwasdevelopedby
theUnited States during World War
II and portable
versions were developed by the US military in the
1960sand1970s.The signal also incorporates a data
channel which was used by the US Navy to
communicatewithsubmarinesinthe1970s.
Loran/eLoran is considered by many as an ideal
complement to and backup for GNSS. It
provides
similar services but has much different
phenomenology than GNSS. Where GNSS is very
high frequency, Loran is low frequency (100kHz).
GNSS is very low power from space while Loran is
very high power from terrestrial towers. Its high
power (350kW to 1 MW) and low frequency also
make Loran/eLoran
very difficult to disrupt. A
receiver with chips enabled for GNSS and eLoran
would be exceptionally difficult to jam and nearly
impossibletospoof.
Many policy professionals believe that
establishment of eLoran systems and wide use of
eLoran chips in navigation and timing receivers
would help eliminate most GNSS jamming and
spoofingbymakingitineffective.
14 CONCLUSIONS
1 Satellite systems have affected many areas of
human activity in the world. The increasing
numberofsystemsofferingsimilarservicesresults
inthegrowingnumberofdifferentreceivers.What
isurgentlyneeded,therefore,istheunificationof
devices so that they could
automatically and
simultaneously use many different systems,
improvingtheaccuracyofestimates.
2 Asthesesystemsarecommonlyusedintheworld,
furtherintegrationofallsatellitesystemsaspartof
GNSSisrequiredandfurthereffortsmustbemade
to make GNSS more immune to increasingly
frequentincidentsofjamming
andspoofing.
3 The eLoran system is currently the best the
technical and scientific solution to allowing for
effective protection of the Global Navigation
SatelliteSystems.
4 Every day human activity around the world
depends upon satellite systems for timing and
navigation. EU Member States should strive to
protect the
GNSS by the construction of
cooperatingnationaleLoranstation.