
106
almost no room for individual often subjective
inspector interpretation. At present ECDIS related
procedures are not completely settled what causes
frequentconfusionsaboutitsusage.Itisaninterestof
all parties involved to agree on international
standardsandproceduresforECDISservice.
2 POSITIONFIXANDPOSITIONCROSS‐CHECK
ECDIS introduction changed the view at position
fixingon boardmodernships.Besideother benefits,
unlikewithpaper charts navigationOOW canfocus
onthenavigationalsituationwithoutinterruptionfor
continuous position plotting. GNSS derived position
(usually GPS) is unceasingly plotted on the ECDIS
screenandthe wholesystem is
basedonnumber of
sensorswhichmustbecross‐checkedbyothermeans
tokeepthe shipon the safeside [7].ECDISused in
conjunctionwith traditionalnavigation methodslike
visual, radar, and celestial observations gives an
overallperceptionofthecurrentsituation[11].
It is an imperative to understand
the difference
between position fixing and position cross‐checking
definitions. When paper charts were in use position
fixing term apply as it was plotted on the chart
manually by OOW. Position co‐ordinates were
obtained from GPS, radar or by visual observations
and then plotted on the paper chart by
navigating
officer. Situation was pretty straight‐forward: fix
position and plot it on the chart. Nowadays when
working with ECDIS ship’s position is fixed and
plotted on the chart continuously and OOW is
responsible for cross‐checking of position derived
fromGNSSreceiver.
2.1 Positioncross‐checkintervals
Whenusingpaper
chartstermpositionfixing interval
meanthowoften positionshouldhave to be plotted
manually on the paper chart by OOW. Additionally
therewasarequirementforconfirmingGPSderived
position accuracy by use of other position fixing
methodsatintervalsfrequentenoughnotrunintothe
danger in the
time between fixes. At present, while
usingECDISpositionfixintervaldefinitiondoesnot
applyasfixing isalreadydoneandpositionisplotted
unceasingly. Today we can say only about position
cross‐checkinginterval.
Table1.Positionfixingandcross‐checkingintervals
_______________________________________________
GPSderivedVisual,radar,
positioncelestial,position
_______________________________________________
Plotting Required Plotting Required
method intervalmethodinterval
_______________________________________________
Paper Plotted Vesselcannot
charts manually runintoPlotted
byOOW dangerduring manuallyNot
ECDIS Plotted theinterval byspecified
Automaticallybetweenfixes OOW
byECDIS
_______________________________________________
Evaluating question no. 4.26 in OCIMF Vessel
Inspection Questionnaire itcanbe seen that interval
forGPSposition cross‐checkingbyother methods is
not precisely identified. It says that “At least two
methods of position fixing should be charted, where
possible.Visualandradarpositionfixingandmonitoring
techniques should be used whenever possible. GPS
derivedpositionsshouldalwaysbeverifiedbyalternative
methods” [8]. It is essential to specify position cross‐
checkingintervalswithinNavigationalProceduresin
Safety Management System [13]. Let’s study an
exampleextractedfromoneofthemajoroilshipping
companies’navigationalprocedures.Whilstthevessel
wasontheopenoceanthepositionfixingintervalset
by company policy was
one hour. This interval
decreased gradually as the vessel approaches the
land.Whennavigatinginconfinedwaterswithpilot
onboardtheintervalforpositionfixingwasseton3
minutes. Asaresultnavigating officer was required
toplotthe positionmanually(using mixed methods
GPS,visualorradar)
atveryshortintervalsinorder
tonavigatesafelyandconformtoSafetyManagement
System procedures. Situation becomes unsafe
especiallyduringnighttimewhenofficerwasforced
to be a multitasker and focus in the same time on
collision avoidance, monitoring the helmsman
responseonpilot’s orders, reportingtoVTS stations
and other duties. OOW was constantly shifting
betweenthechartroomandconningpositiontesting
his rapid eye accommodation skills. In order to
supportbridgeteamitwasquitecommontoengage
anotherofficerjustforpositionplottingbutitleadsto
work/rest hour’s issues when arriving in port. SIRE
inspectors are very sensitive about hours of rest
regulationsandstudying VIQquestionno.4.9itcan
be noted that bridge manning is underlined there
“Inspectorsmusttakeintoaccounttheimpactofadditional
bridgemanningupontheworkloadofanyindividualand
impact of hours of rest regulations”
[8]. ECDIS
introduction changed this ridiculous situation and
improved safety of navigation significantly. OOW
finallycanfocusonthenavigationalsituationhaving
advantage of real time position plotting on ECDIS
display. What remains to be specified is a position
cross‐checkinterval.Itisquitecommonthatposition
cross‐checking intervals
are simply copied from
previous position fixing interval requirements
applicable for paper chart navigation. Lack of
understanding of ECDIS system and advantages
which comes with it leads to dangerous situation
whennavigatingofficerisrequiredtocross‐checkhis
GPSpositionatabsurdintervals.Onceagain,position
fixintervaland
position cross‐check intervalarenot
thesamethings.MaingoalofECDISintroductionon
board the vessels was to lessen the workload and
improve navigation safety. GNSS derived position
must be checked‐no question about it, but cross‐
checking it every 3 minutes is like moving back to
papercharts
age.Itisfutiletokeepcontinuousdouble
positonmonitoring.IfGNSSisnottobetrustedfora
fewminutesthenwhatisthepointofusingECDIS.
Asaconclusion,thelastsentenceinVIQquestion
no.4.26“The frequency of positionfixing should be such
thatthe
vesselcannotrunintodangerduringtheinterval
between fixes” [8] is always satisfied while working
withECDISasthepositionisfixedcontinuouslyand
the distance passed between fixes is always lesser
thanthedistancetotheclosestdanger.