16
a set of numerical simulation; the results of own
ship’sactionasstand‐onshipareshownintable2.
Table2. Crossing simulation calculation stand‐on ship’s
action, (safety passing distance DSPA=1’.0, V
1=16, C1 =0,
D=8.0,V
01=29.5,C01=212,TCPA=16.3)
_______________________________________________
No. Targetship Ownship (stand‐onship) action
___________________________________________
B DCPA Dclose C0 Dcollid C0DactC0
_______________________________________________
1 208 0.55 1.83 177.8‐‐2.8 18
2 209 0.41 1.90 178.6‐‐3.0 21
3 210 0.27 1.94 180.0 0.55 14.4 3.3 24
4 211 0.13 1.97 175.0 0.96 172.8 3.6 26
5 212‐0.01 1.99 112.3 1.01 93.6 3.8 28
6 213‐0.15 1.99 108.0 1.01 86.4 4.2 29
7
214‐0.29 1.98 108.7‐‐4.4 31
_______________________________________________
Comparing the collision avoidance action results
intable1andtable2,thegive‐wayship’sdistanceof
close‐quartersituationislonger0.06to0.42milesthan
thatofthestand‐onship,whichisequivalentto7 to
51 seconds. The duty officer on the give‐way ship
should
fully consider the stand‐on ship officer’s
psychology bearing ability and take early collision
avoidanceaction.
Also, we can get the result that the distance of
give‐way ship’s close‐quarter situation is larger 1.16
to1.46milesthanitscollisiondistance.Such ashort
time interval will not allow
the officer take any
hesitationandrequirehimorherinatimelymanner
to make correct collision avoidance decision‐making
andtakedirectactions.
4 CONCEPTOFDOUBLECOLLISION
AVOIDANCEANDCLOSE‐QUARTER
SITUATION
Ship’s collision segments will include the free
navigationatadistance,riskofcollision,close‐quarter
situation, imminent danger and collision
[5, 6]
. From
late segment of the risk of collision to the early
segmentclose‐quartersituation is theforming phase
of close‐quarter situation and is the most important
momentofthemanipulatingactionaloneforthetwo
ships. After the two ships coordinated action, by
avoiding the close‐quarter situation,
these two ships
can pass in a safety distance and can sufficiently
avoidcollision.
Inrule8ActiontoavoidCollision paragraph(a),
theminimumlimitofʺampletimeʺshouldbenotto
form the close‐quarter situation. The stand‐on ship
ʺmay however take action to avoid collision by
her
manoeuvrealoneʺisthekeyofnotletthevesselsfall
inclose‐quartersituation.Sincethen,thereisnomore
absoluteRightrouteforthestand‐onship.Thestand‐
on ship must bear the obligation of action alone to
avoidclose‐quartersituation.Theconceptofʺdouble
collision avoidanceʺ in the modified collision
regulationshasbeenclearly revealedwhich requires
ship officers to have clear quantitative distance
figures.
Thekeystepand thefirst priorityof establishing
practice for preventing collision at sea are to avoid
close‐quarter situation. The outlook, judgment,
decision‐making, action and validation segments
shouldbearoundthisfirstprioritysoastograspthe
crucial point of collision avoidance. If this concept
becomescommoncognitiveandwidelybeused,more
andmoreshipmanipulations couldleadtosafepass
inadesirabledistance.
5 CONCLUSION
Through calculating the distance of close‐quarter
situation,
wefindthattheactionofgive‐wayvesselis
easier to achieve the desired effect of collision
avoidancethanthatofthestand‐onship.Wesuggest
that the give‐way vessel’s collision avoidance action
should be strictly observed to make it not lose the
good anti‐collision opportunity. In
fact, all ships are
responsibletoensurenavigationsafetyandprotection
ofthe marineenvironment and arethe main partof
the obligations. The division of stand‐on ship and
give‐wayshipbythecollisionavoidancerulesisonly
thedivisionofobligationforcollisionavoidanceand
not to
exempt the stand‐on ship from liability of
complyingwiththeobligations.Thegive‐wayvessel,
however,shouldfullyrecognizeherownadvantages,
give the stand‐on ship more behavior space and
relieve the psychological pressure of stand‐on ship
officer.Becausethepurposeofpracticeforpreventing
collisionatsea
istoavoidclose‐quartersituation, we
should advocates the concept ofʺdouble collision
avoidanceʺ. Estimating the close‐quarter situation
distanceandtheimmediatedangerdistancecorrectly
will helpthe navigator fullyunderstand the process
of collision avoidance and take correct collision
avoidance action in a timely manner. This
massage,
nodoubt,will increasethe navigator’sresponsibility
andself‐confidenceofanti‐collisionmanipulationand
will be the basis of analyzing specific encounter
situationandcollisionavoidancedecision‐making.
REFERENCES
[1]Bi Xiuying. Study on Ship’s Collision Risk Index and
CollisionAvoidanceModel[D],Dalian:Dalianmaritime
university,2000
[2]Hayama IMAZU. Study on the Time Required for
Collision Avoidance [C] // Tokyo University of
MercantileMarine.1992,9:123‐129
[3]K.H.Kwik. Collision Prevention by Precalculated
Evasive Manoeuvres [C] // Eleventh Ship Control
SystemsSymposium.Southampton,UK. 1997:11‐21
[4]WuZhaoLin.TheShip’sCollisionAvoidingandWatch
Keeping [M]. Dalian: Dalian maritime university
PublishingHouse,1998:35‐40
[5]YanQingxin.Thequantitysearchthattheshipavoidsto
touch.ThejournalofWuhantransportationscienceand
technologyuniversity[J],1997,21(6):12‐15
[6]ZhaoJinsongetc..CollisionandcollisionavoidingRules
[M]. Dalian: Dalian maritime university Publishing
House,1997:205‐218