13
1 CLOSE‐QUARTERSITUATIONDISTANCEAND
IMMEDIATEDANGERDISTANCE
Theunderstandingofthetermssuchas“closequarter
situation”and“immediatedanger”isveryimportant
toship’sofficers.Howtousethemcorrectlyisstilla
questionnotquitewellanswered.
Thedistance ofclose quartersituation(Dclose) is
definedasanact
iontakingdistancetoatargetship,
whenownshiptakesalargealteringcourse(suchas
90°)toavoidcollisionwiththetargetship,whichcan
makeownshippassthetargetshipattheminimum
safetydistance.
The distance of immediate danger (Dcollid) is
definedasanact
iontakingdistancetoatargetship,at
which own ship canʹt avoid collide with the target
shipbasedonownshipalonealteringcourseaction.
Thispaperwilldiscussownship’srelative motion
to a target shipand define DCPA as plus or minus.
When the target ship is on the left side of relative
motion tra
ck, define DCPA asʺpositiveʺ. When the
targetshipisontherightsideoftherelativemotion
track,defineDCPAasʺnegativeʺ.
1.1 Theshipmotionmathematicalmodels
Asshowninfigure1,OandTrepresentrespectively
theownshipandtheta
rgetship.Letthevelocityand
courseofownshipastheV
0andtheC0respectively,
thevelocityandcourseofthetargetshipareV
1andC1
respectively,azimuthforB,distanceforDist,
1
VCA
.
So,therelativevelocityV
01andrelativecourseC01of
own ship to target ship, will show respectively as
follows
[1,2,and3]
:
0011
sin( ) sin( )

x
VV C V C (1)
0011
cos( ) cos( )

y
VV C V C
(2)
1
1
01
1
(/) ( 0, 0)
90 ( 0, 0)
180 ( / ) ( 0)
270 ( 0, 0)
360 ( / ) ( 0, 0)
(0, 0)






xy x y
xy
xy y
xy
xy x y
xy
tg V V V V
VV
tg V V V
C
VV
tg V V V V
nil V V
(3)
221/2
01
()
xy
VVV
(4)
Research on Double Collision Avoidance Mechanism
of Ships at Sea
X.Y.Bi&X.J.Liu
GuangzhouMaritimeInstitute,Guangzhou,China
ABSTRACT:Whentwopowerdrivenvesselsencounteratseasoastoinvolveriskofcollision, theyneedto
avoidcollisioneffectively.TheconceptofRightShipmaymisleadthisship’sofficersthinkinghisorherdirect
navigatinghasabsolutepowerwiththisspecialship.Thispa
perwilldefineDCPAsymbols;givethecauseand
themethodofdoublecollisionavoidancemechanismofshipsatsea.
http://www.transnav.eu
the International Journal
on Marine Navigation
and Safety of Sea Transportation
Volume 9
Number 1
March 2015
DOI:10.12716/1001.09.01.01
14
Figure1.Ownship’srelativemoti on
DCPA (distance of the closest point of approach)
and TCPA (time to closest point of approach) will
showrespectivelyasfollows
[1]
:
01
sin( ) DCPA Dist C B (5)
01
01
cos( )
Dist C B
TCPA
V
(6)
1.2 Thedistanceofclose‐quartersituation
Asshowninfigure2,letsafetyencounterdistancebe
DSPA,namelytheradiusofthecircleTinthisfigure,
theturningradiusofownshipbeR.Whenownship
arriveatpointAinrelativemotiontothe
targetship,
it begin to give way altering course tostarboard.
TheownshipwillgettopointEinthiscourseafter
doubleship’slengthwhichiscalledthelagdistance.
The own ship begin turning from point E, reached
pointE
1intruemotionontheturningcircleH,while
target ship along her course C
1 to get point T1. The
own ship turning circle H tangents the target ship
safetyencounterdistanceT
1atpointE1.So, segment
ATisthedistanceofclose‐quartersituationshowas
D. This close‐quarter situation distance can be
calculated by the relative motion equation of own
ship.
Letthecycleofownship’sturningcircleunderfull
rudderbet
0minutes,turningangularvelocitybe
ω
,
the own ship takes t
0 minutes completing relative
movementtothetargetfrompointOtopointE.Then
theownshipbyturningmovementfromthepointE
to the point E
1, at this time the target ship carrying
safetydistance circlemovein linearfrom point Tto
point T
1, it takes time interval of t1‐t0, the turning
circleradius(R)isgenerallydoubletheshipʹslength,
then
0
2
T
(7)
Figure2. The distance to target ship in close‐quarter
situation
In Cartesian coordinate system XOY, the relative
motiontrajectoryequationofownshipfrompointO
(t=0),thenpassingE(t=t
0),tothepointE2(t= t1)can
beexpressedasfollows.
000
000
10 010 1
10 010 01
1 cos( ( )) sin( ( )) cos( )
sin( ( )) cos( ( )) 1 sin( )
() sin()
() sin()














tt tt C
X
R
tt tt C
Y
Vt t Vt C
Vt t Vt C
(8)
11
222
( sin()) (Y cos())


tt tt
DSPA X Dist B Dist B (9)
Decoding formula (7)‐(9), making the ship’s
distancetothetargetatthetangentpointE
1equalto
thesafetyencounterdistance,wecangett
0andt1,so
we can solve the close‐quarter situation distance
(Dclose=D).
1
22
0
2
01 0
0
2
((( )))

L
DDCPA VTCPAt
V
(10)
The own ship’s maximum altering course to the
rightwillbeasfollow.
10
0
2( )


tt
C
T
(11)
In the same way, considering the own ship as a
onepoint,theextentofthetargetshipwillexpandto
thesumoftwo shipʹslength, L
0 + L1,replace itwith
the DSPA in formula (9), we can get the collision
distance(Dcollid=D)andtheownship’smaximum
alteringcoursetostarboard.Ifthelengthofthetarget
shipisunknown,wecantakeadesirableL
1=330mto
getaconservativeestimatecollisiondistance.
2 EXAMPLES
2.1 Theactionofgive‐wayship
LetownshiplengthbeL
0=190m,velocityandcourse
as V
0=16 kns and C0=000° respectively, velocity and
15
courseofthetargetshiparerespectivelyV
1=18kns,
C
1=240°,the azimuthof target ship is B=30°,
distanceD=8nauticalmiles.
So, according to the formula above, we can get
owe ship’s relative speed to the target ship V
01=29.5
knots, the relative course C
01=32°.0. Target ship is
locatedontheleftsideoftherelativemovementline,
theDCPA=+0.27nmiles,theTCPA=16.3minutes.
Figure3.Thecollisionriskandrelativemotiontotargetof
give‐wayship
TakingDSPA=1.0nauticalmiles,letthesumofthe
two ship length be the maximum, L
0+L1= 190+330=
520m= 0.28 nautical miles, the turning circle radius
(R) be double the shipʹs length, 380m=0.21 nautical
miles, the period of own ship turning circle be 5
minutes, wecan calculate the close‐quarter situation
distanceDclose=2.13nauticalmiles,atthatpointown
shipwillaltercourse
2°tostarboardside,wecanalso
calculate the collision distance Dcollid=0.59 nautical
miles,atthatpointownshipshouldaltercourse7°.2
tostarboardsidetoavoidcollision.
Anothercurveinthefigureiscollisionriskcurve.
This curve can be used to determine collision
avoidanceopportunity and
thevalueof thecollision
avoidanceaction.Forthisexampletheopportunityof
actiontakingis3.8nauticalmilesfromthetargetship,
theactionvalueisalteringcourse24°tostarboard.
2.2 Theactionofstand‐onship
LetownshiplengthbeL
0=190m,velocityandcourse
as V
0=18 kns and C0=240° respectively, velocity and
courseofthetargetshiparerespectivelyV
1=16kns,
C
1=000°,the azimuthof target ship is B=210°,
distanceD=8nauticalmiles.
So, according to the formula above, we can get
owe ship’s relative speed to the target ship V
01=29.5
knots, the relative course C
01=212°.0. Target ship is
locatedontheleftsideoftherelativemovementline,
theDCPA=+0.27nmiles,theTCPA=16.3minutes.
Figure4.Thecollisionriskandrelativemotiontotargetof
stand‐onship
TakingDSPA=1.0nauticalmiles,letthesumofthe
two ship length be the maximum, L
0+L1= 190+330=
520m= 0.28 nautical miles, the turning circle radius
(R) be double the shipʹs length, 380m=0.21 nautical
miles, the period of own ship turning circle be 5
minutes, wecan calculate the close‐quarter situation
distanceDclose=1.94nauticalmiles,atthatpointown
shipwill alter course
180°tostarboard side, we can
also calculate the collision distance Dcollid=0.55
nautical miles,at that point own ship should alter
course14°.4tostarboardside toavoidcollision.The
opportunityofactiontakingis3.3nauticalmilesfrom
thetargetship;theactionvalueisalteringcourse24°
tostarboard.
3 THERELATIONSHIPBETWEENTHESETWO
DISTANCES
In case of crossing situation, the distance of close‐
quartersituationofgive‐wayshipisgreaterthanthat
ofthestand‐onship.Inthecaseaboveitisabout0.19
nauticalmiles,whichisequivalentto23seconds.The
minimum
limit of the give‐way ship’s collision
avoidance action must not drag to the close‐quarter
situation distance in order to give stand‐on ship
enoughtimetotakenecessaryactionalone.Basedon
theaboveexample,takingdifferentbearingsoftarget
ship,wegetasetofnumericalsimulation;
theresults
of own ship’s action as give‐way ship are shown in
table1.
Table1. Crossing simulation calculation give‐way ship’s
action, (safety passing distance DSPA=1’.0, V
1=18, C1 =240,
D=8.0,V
01=29.5,C01=32,TCPA=16.3)
_______________________________________________
No.TargetshipOwnship (give‐wayship) action
___________________________________________
B DCPA Dclose C0 Dcollid C0 DactC0
_______________________________________________
1 28 0.55 1.89 81.4‐‐2.920
2 29 0.41 2.02 95.0‐‐3.223
3 30 0.27 2.13 108.7 0.59 7.2 3.824
4 31 0.13 2.21 113.8 0.96 50.4 4.127
5 32 ‐0.01 2.29 126.7 1.15 72 4.230
6 33 ‐0.15 2.35 137.5 1.19 93.6 4.532
7
 34 ‐0.29 2.40 153.4‐‐4.734
_______________________________________________
Also, considering the stand‐on ship taking action
alone,takingdifferentbearingsoftargetship,weget
16
a set of numerical simulation; the results of own
ship’sactionasstand‐onshipareshownintable2.
Table2. Crossing simulation calculation stand‐on ship’s
action, (safety passing distance DSPA=1’.0, V
1=16, C1 =0,
D=8.0,V
01=29.5,C01=212,TCPA=16.3)
_______________________________________________
No. Targetship Ownship (stand‐onship) action
___________________________________________
B DCPA Dclose C0 Dcollid C0DactC0
_______________________________________________
1 208 0.55 1.83 177.8‐‐2.8 18
2 209 0.41 1.90 178.6‐‐3.0 21
3 210 0.27 1.94 180.0 0.55 14.4 3.324
4 211 0.13 1.97 175.0 0.96 172.8 3.626
5 212‐0.01 1.99 112.3 1.01 93.6 3.828
6 213‐0.15 1.99 108.0 1.01 86.4 4.229
7
 214‐0.29 1.98 108.7‐‐4.4 31
_______________________________________________
Comparing the collision avoidance action results
intable1andtable2,thegive‐wayship’sdistanceof
close‐quartersituationislonger0.06to0.42milesthan
thatofthestand‐onship,whichisequivalentto7 to
51 seconds. The duty officer on the give‐way ship
should
fully consider the stand‐on ship officer’s
psychology bearing ability and take early collision
avoidanceaction.
Also, we can get the result that the distance of
give‐way ship’s close‐quarter situation is larger 1.16
to1.46milesthanitscollisiondistance.Such ashort
time interval will not allow
the officer take any
hesitationandrequirehimorherinatimelymanner
to make correct collision avoidance decision‐making
andtakedirectactions.
4 CONCEPTOFDOUBLECOLLISION
AVOIDANCEANDCLOSE‐QUARTER
SITUATION
Ship’s collision segments will include the free
navigationatadistance,riskofcollision,close‐quarter
situation, imminent danger and collision
[5, 6]
. From
late segment of the risk of collision to the early
segmentclose‐quartersituation is theforming phase
of close‐quarter situation and is the most important
momentofthemanipulatingactionaloneforthetwo
ships. After the two ships coordinated action, by
avoiding the close‐quarter situation,
these two ships
can pass in a safety distance and can sufficiently
avoidcollision.
Inrule8ActiontoavoidCollision paragraph(a),
theminimumlimitofʺampletimeʺshouldbenotto
form the close‐quarter situation. The stand‐on ship
ʺmay however take action to avoid collision by
her
manoeuvrealoneʺisthekeyofnotletthevesselsfall
inclose‐quartersituation.Sincethen,thereisnomore
absoluteRightrouteforthestand‐onship.Thestand‐
on ship must bear the obligation of action alone to
avoidclose‐quartersituation.Theconceptofʺdouble
collision avoidanceʺ in the modified collision
regulationshasbeenclearly revealedwhich requires
ship officers to have clear quantitative distance
figures.
Thekeystepand thefirst priorityof establishing
practice for preventing collision at sea are to avoid
close‐quarter situation. The outlook, judgment,
decision‐making, action and validation segments
shouldbearoundthisfirstprioritysoastograspthe
crucial point of collision avoidance. If this concept
becomescommoncognitiveandwidelybeused,more
andmoreshipmanipulations couldleadtosafepass
inadesirabledistance.
5 CONCLUSION
Through calculating the distance of close‐quarter
situation,
wefindthattheactionofgive‐wayvesselis
easier to achieve the desired effect of collision
avoidancethanthatofthestand‐onship.Wesuggest
that the give‐way vessel’s collision avoidance action
should be strictly observed to make it not lose the
good anti‐collision opportunity. In
fact, all ships are
responsibletoensurenavigationsafetyandprotection
ofthe marineenvironment and arethe main partof
the obligations. The division of stand‐on ship and
give‐wayshipbythecollisionavoidancerulesisonly
thedivisionofobligationforcollisionavoidanceand
not to
exempt the stand‐on ship from liability of
complyingwiththeobligations.Thegive‐wayvessel,
however,shouldfullyrecognizeherownadvantages,
give the stand‐on ship more behavior space and
relieve the psychological pressure of stand‐on ship
officer.Becausethepurposeofpracticeforpreventing
collisionatsea
istoavoidclose‐quartersituation, we
should advocates the concept ofʺdouble collision
avoidanceʺ. Estimating the close‐quarter situation
distanceandtheimmediatedangerdistancecorrectly
will helpthe navigator fullyunderstand the process
of collision avoidance and take correct collision
avoidance action in a timely manner. This
massage,
nodoubt,will increasethe navigator’sresponsibility
andself‐confidenceofanti‐collisionmanipulationand
will be the basis of analyzing specific encounter
situationandcollisionavoidancedecision‐making.
REFERENCES
[1]Bi Xiuying. Study on Ship’s Collision Risk Index and
CollisionAvoidanceModel[D],Dalian:Dalianmaritime
university,2000
[2]Hayama IMAZU. Study on the Time Required for
Collision Avoidance [C] // Tokyo University of
MercantileMarine.1992,9:123‐129
[3]K.H.Kwik. Collision Prevention by Precalculated
Evasive Manoeuvres [C] // Eleventh Ship Control
SystemsSymposium.Southampton,UK. 1997:11‐21
[4]WuZhaoLin.TheShip’sCollisionAvoidingandWatch
Keeping [M]. Dalian: Dalian maritime university
PublishingHouse,1998:35‐40
[5]YanQingxin.Thequantitysearchthattheshipavoidsto
touch.ThejournalofWuhantransportationscienceand
technologyuniversity[J],1997,21(6):12‐15
[6]ZhaoJinsongetc..CollisionandcollisionavoidingRules
[M]. Dalian: Dalian maritime university Publishing
House,1997:205‐218