588
energy receivers installed in these systems in many
cases reaches the va lues up to 80…100MW. Such a
greatvaluesofpowercauseanecessitytouseahigh
voltage solutions, and a level of applied voltages
reacheseven11kV.Underdescribedconditionsmany
new problems had been observed and new
challenges, how to overcome them, appear. It is a
starting point to second aspect concerning the new
competencesandKUP’s(Knowledge,Understanding
and Proficiency) for highly qualified staff, and
dedicatedmainly to electrical,electronic andcontrol
engineering issues. Safe operation of many
sophisticated ships today is greatly dependent on
satisfactory
skills and qualifications in the electrical,
electronic and control engineering field being at all
times available and more and more developed
onboard. That is why such a big power plants and
electricmotorsusedforpropulsionofthevessellike
previously mentioned, also very complicated
computercontrolandmonitoringsystemson
boardof
ships, should be maintained and repaired by really
competentandwellpreparedtoperformETOduties
person. Such a person, responsible for repair and
maintenance of electrical and electronic installations
on board of ships, must have thorough knowledge,
which is not possible to obtain working for a long
periodinenginedepartmentoftheshiponly.Adeep
theoretical background and a ppropriately conducted
training based on specialised laboratories and
simulators is needed. It is worthy to add, that a
majority of shipowners presently have employed
electrical / electronic officers, but at the same time
many contrary situations were noted.
One of the
strange and well analysed cases concerning a dead
short caused the failure of generating set’s circuit
breaker during a voyage of passenger ship m/s
STATENDAM was described in [4]. The most
intriguing were the statements formulated by the
TransportSafety BoardofCanada:firstly,“
Noneofthe
senior engineers onboard had theoretical or practical
education in 6,6 kV generation, distribution and trouble
shooting
” and secondly, “The seafarers Training,
Certification and Watchkeeping (STCW) code however,
doesnotidentify electriciansasaseafaringprofession and
does not specify a minimum internationally applicable
standardfortheireducationtrainingandcompetence
”[4].
Itisobvious,thatthiskindofthinking,basedonthe
existingofthattimeversionoftheSTCWConvention
andCode[5],hadtobechanged.Infact,therewere
many important circumstances and reasons, which
created a need for international qualification
requirements for Marine Electro‐Technical Officers
(ETO), in the light of the continuous technological
progress as well as the new required qualifications
and skills for electrical/electronic installations
operation in the field under consideration. More
detailed information concerning ETO background,
progressinrelatedstandardsandlegislativewaymay
befoundin[6],[7].
2
ALEGISLATIVEWAYTOWARDSMET
STANDARDSFORETO’S
ThefirstunsuccessfulattemptofPoland,Norwayand
USA to introduce regulations for electro‐technical
officerstotheSTCW’95Conventiontookplaceinthe
years 1992‐1995. In March 2008, Poland, France,
United Kingdom and Bulgaria, submitted the
definition and mandatory requirements for
certification of Electro‐Technical Officer (ETO) and
Senior Electro‐Technical Officer (SETO) [8]. In 2008
the representatives of Poland in cooperation with
other countries have undertaken the initiative to
create the international informal working group
oriented to ETO works, named ETO Forum. The
representatives of Bulgaria, France, IFSMA, Islamic
Republic
of Iran, ITF, Malaysia, Poland, Sweden,
Ukraine, United Kingdom and United States of
Americahave participatedin thisworking group. A
detailedlistofpersonsinvolvedmaybefoundin[7].
Thiswasfollowedbytheformulationofthedefinition
of training and certification requirements for the
Electronic Officer submitted by
the Islamic Republic
ofIran[9] and a formulation ofthe proposalon the
knowledge and skill requirements for Electronic
OfficerpresentedbyThePeople’sRepublicofChina
in [10]. In the next step the delegations of Poland,
France,theUnitedKingdom,BulgariaandtheIslamic
Republic of Iran, in
September 2009, consolidated
from their previous documents the requirements for
ETO at operation and management levels and
presentedthemasajointproposalissuedas[11].Itis
worthytonoteapositionofUSandGermandelegates
included in [12], that there should be two levels of
training and related
requirements, i.e. support and
operational. After an in‐depth discussion it was
agreedacompromisesolutiontoincludetotheSTCW
Convention and the Code the requirements for
Electro‐Technical Officers (operational level) and
Electro‐Technical Ratings (support level). The
significant progress has taken place during the
ConferenceofParties
totheInternationalConvention
on Standards of Training, Certification and
Watchkeeping for Seafarers in Manila in 2010. The
mandatoryminimumrequirementsforcertificationof
electro‐technical officers were formally included in
the Section A‐III/6 and for certification of electro‐
technical ratings in A‐III/4‐7 [13], and later on 2011
Edition of STCW Convention and STCW Code [3].
ThesearethefirstinIMOhistorystandardsforelectro
‐ technical personnel and now international
community of seafarers is just equipped with
appropriatelegalinstrumentsinthediscussedmatter.
3
ASHORTDESCRIPTIONOFTHEMINIMUM
STANDARDSCOMPETENCEFORELECTRO‐
TECHNICALOFFICERS
The minimum standards of competence for ETO,
established in the STCW Convention and Code’s
Annex approved at the end of June 2010 by the
Diplomatic Conference in Manila, and specified in
[13] cover 18 competences divided into three
functions:
1. Electrical, Electronic and Control
Engineering,2.MaintenanceandRepair,aswellas3.
Controlling the Operation of the Ship and Care for
personsonBoard.Allfunctions arededicatedtothe
operational level. The competences of the first
functionconcernthemonitoringtheoperationofthe
electrical electronic and
control systems, including
propulsionandauxiliarymachinery,theoperationof
generators and distribution systems as well the