118
In recent years, it’s hard for higher education of
maritime services to meet the growing demands
forhighershippingtalentsbroughtbytheboomof
Chinese shipping industry both in quality and
quantity, hence the government encourages more
enterprises to train their own maritime services’
manpower,whichresultsinthe
School‐Enterprise
Joint model. On 24th March 2010, Shanghai Jiao
Tong University and Baltic Exchange signed a
Memorandum of Understanding on cultivating
higher professional personnel in maritime
brokerage and maritime finance, aiming to
provide qualified people for the establishment of
ShanghaiInternationalShippingCenterbymeans
of “International Experiences, Chinese
Requirements, Real Case Study and Bilingual
Teaching”model[11].Besides,on25thNov.2011,
DalianMaritimeUniversity collaboratedwithFar
East Horizon Company to nurture maritime
financial talents at a master level, trying to offer
highershippingfinancialpersonnel[12].
FurtherMaritimeServices’Education
One ofthe most reasonable factors which restrict
the development of Chinese higher maritime
services’talentsisthehighthreshold.Tobeareal
international maritime services’ talent, the four
elementsmustberequired:(a)adequatemaritime
knowledge and background; (b) English
proficiency; (c) global perspective;
(d) worthy
experiences.Andtoachievethesegoals,onemust
study continuously both in working and spare
time.Correspondingly,furtherstudycollegesand
institutessuchas Shanghai AdvancedInstituteof
InternationalShipping(SAIIS)wereestablishedfor
thosewhoareeagertobeoutstandinginmaritime
services’sectors.Foundedin2012,SAIIS
launched
Shipping Financial EMBA (Executive Master of
Business Administration) Course with its first
phase of approximately 30 students on 6th Dec.
2013, and will release more programmes in the
near future. Teachers in SAIIS are globally
recruited from some distinguished universities
and institutes such as Cambridge University and
CassBusiness
School[13].
3.3 RareMaritimeDisciplineEducationinChina
Chinesemaritimeregardingeducationcurrentlyfocus
on many common areas including typical seafarers
training, maritime law education, and shipping
management, etc, yet, those rare but significant
disciplines such as maritime archaeology, maritime
sports, and hydrographic surveying, etc, are rarely
involved.Fortunately,few
collegesandinstitutesare
conscious of the adverse situation and start
establishingsuchkindofmajorstomeetthedemands
of markets. For example, Wuhan Institute of
Shipbuilding Technology launched a programme
named Yacht Design and Production, offering
knowledgeandskillsina wildrangofsectorsrelated
to yacht
including yacht materials andmanufacture,
yacht engineering systems, yacht design and
productiontechnology.
4 MAINPROBLEMSOFCHINESEMET
Although Chinese MET made great contribution to
the shipping industry both in China and overseas
sinceitsfirstmodernshippingdiscipline established
atShanghaiin1909,therestillsomeissuesshouldbe
concerned.
For one thing, from the typical Chinese MET
aspect, the average enrollment of students is
numerous,reaching43334singlesannuallyinthepast
five years, which is strongly contrary to the lack of
funding, experimental facilities and teaching staffs,
leading to a relatively lower quality of graduates.
Takethe
teacher‐studentratioinSMUforexample,it
steps over the bottom line of 1:18 to a level of
approximately 1:25. According to a survey for 48
maritimeschoolscarriedoutin2011,andtaking10%
annuallygrowingrateintoconsideration,thepresent
average government funding for maritime students
are250
poundspereacheveryyear,amongwhichthe
amountof highereducation are 580, with the senior
andjunior vocational education 140, 20 respectively.
Ifplusthetuition,the number isgoingtobe 870 on
average [14]. For another thing, the curriculums are
apparently heavy on theory and light
on practice
especially for on board practicing procedure during
which the school is only responsible for little
proportionbutleaveovermoretothecompanyafter
graduation,itconsequentlyleadstoanincreasing of
timeconsumingofthecultivatingcircle,eventosome
extentresultinanincompletecreweducationprocess
forthosewhohavenochancetoworkonboardships,
causing a huge waste of maritime educational
resources,aswellasmaritimetalents.Moreover,there
are sorts of further educational programmes for
seafarers, but almost all of them are concentrate on
direct promotion of crew rankings from lower to
higher level, few working on a transitional career
developmentfromsea toshore, whichisreallyagreat
loss to crews and shipping companies because the
extraordinaryexperiencestheyobtainedfromseaare
quitevaluableforboththemselvesandshippingfirms
onland‐basedposition.
Viewing from the maritime services’ education
dimension, problems are more complicated. In the
first place, the quantity of regarding schools,
disciplines and corresponding students is quite far
smallcomparetothehugeshippingmarketofChina,
reasons for this phenomenon are multiple, one is
becausetheChinesenationalmaritimestrategyfocus
more on the hardware construction
than software
circumstancesinthepastseveraldecades,theotheris
the lack of historic maritime culture which would
have brought more individuals understanding and
getting into shipping industry. Secondly, the quality
of maritime services’ educational components
includingteachers,studentsandcurriculumsdoesnot
really meet the requirements of the speedy
developing of shipping market. For teachers, the
characteristics of maritime services require a
globalizedperspectiveandrelevantfieldbackground
whichtheydon’treallyhavemore;andforstudents,
English has become the biggest obstacle for their
career development no matter how hard they are
doing; as for the curriculums arranging
and
implementation,almostallschoolsaretryingtomake
theircoursesall‐embracingineverymajor,aimingto