554
3.5 EffectofOverlandPropagationandMulti‐path
Signal
Experimental navigation using our training ship
Kaigi‐Maru in July 2012 could be collected some
electric field intensity data including overland
propagation.12‐13 % of propagation path are on
land, which are about 6 n.m. against 50 n.m. which
are
allof propagationpath.Inthecase of300KHz
band,ifallofpropagationpathisland,itisestimated
that electric field intensity of50 n.m. path decreases
about 10 dB (Nishitani 1980).Because decreasing
electric field intensity regarding obtained data by
experimental navigation is approximately 1 dB,
normalsailingontrafficrouteisnoproblem.
Itwas compared with datafor mooring atFukae
pierofKobeportandsailingonKobeairportoff,soit
was observed that electric field intensity decreased
about 2 dB and data fluctuation is slightly large on
mooring at Fukae shown in
Fig. 12(a), (b).It is
considered that 2 dB decreasing of electric field
intensityare to be 5 n.m. distance longer than Kobe
AirportofffromEsakistationwhichwasusedstation
ofDGPSandratioofoverlandpropagationare59%,
thatincludes80 %urbanarea.Butdata
fluctuation
atFukaeisalittlelessthan3dBbecausethereisno
large construction near Fukae pier.Nearby
Kanmon‐Kyo, electric field intensity of Diffraction
lossgeneratedarea44‐6dBμV/mshowninsection3.1
andTable2.Consequently,iftherearesomeeffects
of multi‐path signal,
then electric field intensity
becomestobelessthan40dBμV/m,sothatbiterror
occurs and data of DGPS will have a trouble to
receivebyoccurringbiterror.Thereisapossibility
to be large effect of multipath by gantry crane at
containeryardexceptaneffect
ofbigbridge. Inthe
caseofinsideport,therearesomeproblemwhenpier
docking and undocking.However, investigating
minutely of effect of multi‐path by calculation for
intensity ratio of direct and reflection signal is
physicallyimpossible.Inthecaseofexistingmulti‐
path, it is considered that receiving
signal level is
more than 1 Hz frequency, so we need to review
methods for data collectionandanalyzing,and then
theyarefuturetasks.
Figure 12(a) Sample of Including Much Overland
Propagation
Figure12(b)SampleofNormalSailing
4 CONCLUSION
Weleadedtothepropagationcharacteristicarounda
center of the bridge to apply simplified reflection
wave.The result almost corresponds to measuring
data of electric field intensity.To utilize this
simulationresultsandsomeeffectsofdiffractionloss
by bridge pier becomes to be able to examine
receiving
condition of DGPS station.When DGPS
user cannot utilize the DGPS station which is close
andhassufficientsignalstrength, or when to obtain
position is insufficiency from the beginning, it is
confirmedthattoenterontheextendedlineofbridge
pier is that bit error may occur and
there is a
possibility that it cannot fix accurate position.
Furthermore we measured electric field intensity at
everyeachdistancefromDGPSstationtoresearchan
effectofoverlandpropagation.
Finally, as stated above, there is some possibility
that DGPS correction signal have been occurred bit
errorcausedbydecreasingelectric
fieldintensityand
level fluctuation by multi‐path, etc. nearby large
construction such as big bridge including overland
propagation, so there are some case that normal
DGPS position accuracy cannot obtain.Hereafter,
high accuracy position fix on pier docking and
undockingisessentialtoexecutesafetyandefficiently
navigation for
navigator using DGPS.
Consequently, we have toclarify these phenomenon
and consider countermeasures.In this paper, it is
suggestedthattherearenotonlyeffectofbigbridge
butalsoeffectoflargeconstructionnearpier,andwe
show necessity to investigate minutely an effect of
multi‐path.
REFERENCES
Araki,T.1977,DenjiBougaitoBousiTaisaku,TokyoDenki
UniversityPress,138‐139
DepartmentofDefense,DepartmentofHomelandSecurity
and Department of Transportation: 2008 Federal
RadionavigationPlan,2008
Japan Coast Guard DGPS center, http://www.
kaiho.mlit.go.jp/syoukai/soshiki/toudai/dgps/menu.htm
Kalafus,R.M.,Dierendonck,A.J.VAN&Pealer,N.A.
1986, Special
Committee 104 Recommendations for
Differential GPS Service, The Institute of Navigation,
GlobalPositioningSystemVolumeIII,101‐116
Nishitani, Y. 1980, Hakuyou Denshi Kougaku Gairon,
Seizann‐Do,174‐175
Okuda,S.&Arai,Y.2011.ThePositionAccuracyofDGPS
Affected by the Propagation Characteristic on MF
Beacon Wave, 2011 International
Technical Meeting,
718‐724January24‐26
Okuda, S., Toba, M. & Arai, Y. 2012. The Propagation
CharacteristicofDGPSCorrectionDataSignalinJapan–
Propagation Characteristic near Big Bridge‐, 2012
InternationalTechnicalMeeting,1383‐1389,January29‐31
Shinji, M. 1992, Musen Tsuushin no Denpa Denpan, The
Instituteof
Electronics,InformationandCommunication
Engineers,25‐49
Saito,Y.1996, Digital Modulation TechniquesforWireless
Communications, The Institute of Electronics,
InformationandCommunicationEngineers,70‐107
Yagitani,S.,Nagano,I.,Tabata,T.,Yamagata,K.,Iwasaki,T.
& Isamu Matsumoto, I. 2004, Nighttime Ionospheric
Propagation of MF Radio Waves Used for DGPS
–
Comparison between Observation and Theory‐, IEICE
Transactions on Communications, Vol. J87‐B, No. 12,
2029‐2037