549
1 INTRODUCTION
NavigatorwhosailsnarrowchannelattheInlandSea
requireshighaccuracyoffixedpositionwhichis5m
(2drms) or less.In FRP 2008 (DoD, DoH.S. & DoT
2008), therequirement of position accuracy is 2 5 m
for the inland waterway phase.Therefore the
positionaccuracy
ofstandaloneGPSisinsufficiency.
ConsequentlyitneedstouseDGPS(DifferentialGPS)
fornavigatorsailingtheInlandSea.
Decreased reliability of fixed position using GPS
means that the reliability of GPS signal information
decreases and there is a possibility of abnormal
propagationofDGPScorrectiondatasignal,andsuch
case occurs in the Inland Sea.Decreased reliability
of GPS signal information means that there is
decreased reliability of transmitting signal including
satelliteconditionandsomechangesofGPSreceiving
condition around user including GPS receiver.
Decreasedreliabilityoftransmittingsignalshouldbe
compensatedbyRAIM(RadioAutonomousIntegrity
Monitoring)which
isabletoconfirmitautomatically.
However, if abnormal propagation of DGPS
correction data signal occurs, it is possibility to be
affectedbyit.Inthis paper, weresearchas part of
investigatingreceivedconditionintheInlandSea,but
sailingcircumstanceinEuropewheretherearemany
river ports,
large ships sailing on river around the
Great Lakes have common receiving conditionsame
astheInlandSea.Itconsidersthat changes of GPS
receiving condition are caused by incident of multi
path wave by not only sea reflection but also large
offshorestructuresorotherships.Inthispaper,the
main subject is to analyze the propagation
characteristic of DGPS correction data signal, so to
analyzechangesofGPSreceivingconditionisfuture
task.
The Propagation Characteristic of DGPS Correction
Data Signal at Inland Sea - Propagation Characteristic
on LF/MF Band Radio Wave
S.Okuda,M.Toba&Y.Arai
M
arineTechnicalCollege,Japan
ABSTRACT:UserattheInlandSearequires highpositionaccuracywhichis5m(2drms) orless.Thereforethe
positionaccuracyofstandaloneGPSisinsufficiency.ConsequentlyitneedstouseDGPSfornavigatorsailing
the Inland Sea. We executed numerical simulation of the propagation characteristic
on the extended line of
bridgepieratoppositesidefromDGPSstation,andalreadyconfirmedthatbiterrorinDGPScorrectiondata
signal occurs, and that correction data could not form by bit error. Furthermore, we carried out numerical
simulationofthepropagationcharacteristicofDGPScorrectiondatasignalreceived
atsailingthroughcenterof
thebridge,andsolvedreceivingconditionofDGPScorrectiondatasignalbeforeandafterpassingthroughthe
bridge.Inthispaper,weexecutedtoinspectmutuallyresultsofelectricfieldintensitysimulationforoversea
andoverlandpropagationonsomeseaareaoftheInlandSea
andmeasuringresultsofelectricfieldintensity
forDGPScorrectiondatasignal,andevaluatedthepossibilityofabnormalpropagationcomprehensively.
http://www.transnav.eu
the International Journal
on Marine Navigation
and Safety of Sea Transportation
Volume 7
Number 4
December 2013
DOI:10.12716/1001.07.04.10
550
Abnormal propagation of DGPS correction data
signal is caused by single or multiple actions which
are increase of propagation loss by overland
propagationand/orsomeeffectsbyoffshorestructure
suchasabigbridge.InpreviouspapersatITM2011
andITM2012(Okudaetal.2011&2012),we
executed
numericalsimulationofthepropagationcharacteristic
on the extended line of bridge pier at opposite side
from DGPS station, and confirmed that bit error in
DGPS correction data signal occurs.We also
confirmed that there is a possibility that correction
data could not form bybit error.In this
paper, we
carried out numerical simulation of the propagation
characteristicofDGPScorrectiondatasignalreceived
atsailingthroughcenterofthebridgethatwasfuture
task in previous paper, and solved receiving
conditionof DGPS correction datasignal before and
after passing through the bridge.This simulation
calculated a variation
of signal strength by
composition of superior reflection wave and surface
wave.Whenthetrailshipapproachesfromopposite
side of using DGPS station, around just under the
bridge reflection and/or scattering wave of bridge
girder become to be superior, and signal strength
increases because it is combined with surface
wave.
After passing through the bridge, signal strength
increasesanddecreasesaccordingtocombinedphase
becausereflectionwavefromthebridgeiscombined
with surface wave.Furthermore, we investigated
validity of numerical simulation by checking the
result of electric field measurement and also
investigated effects of oversea and/or overland
propagation by
measuring electric field intensity
every adequate distance at the Inland Sea on
November2010andJuly2012.
2 DGPSINJAPAN
DGPS detects pseudorange error between GPS
satellite and the reference station whose position is
known, converts the error into correction data, and
broadcasts the correction data to user on
board
around the reference station.Each user on board
receivesthecorrectiondatausingMFbeaconreceiver.
Position accuracy is improved by fixed calculation
using the correction data.At present nominal
positionaccuracybystandaloneGPS is 9 m (2drms)
in FRP 2008, on the other hand JCG (Japan Coast
Guard)
announcesthatpositionaccuracybyDGPSis
1m(2drms)orless.Whenusingdifferentialsystem,
accuracy decreases depending on distance from the
referencestation.Thenitisappropriatethatposition
accuracy by DGPS is 15 m (2drms) depending on
distance.DGPS has not only a function of
improvement
ofpositionaccuracybutalsoafunction
ofintegritymonitor.Afunctionofintegritymonitor
informssomechangesofGPSsatellitehealthinessor
decreasingaccuracyofpseudorangemeasurementto
user quickly and break off use of the satellite data.
ThissystemisexactlythesameasDGPSoperatedby
USCG(United
StatusCoastGuard).
At present in Japan there are 27 DGPS stations
whichisthereferencestation,andthecoverageisall
coastal area except a few isolated islands.Table 1
shows DGPS specification operated by JCG.JCG
callsuser’sattentionconcerningDGPScoverage(JCG
DGPScenter).
1 Exceptionof
someareaatInlandSeaabout200km
coverage.
2 Existenceofdifficultcasetousebyeffectofterrain
etc.
HoweverJCGmakenomentionaboutanareaora
phenomenonconcretely.
Table1.DGPSSpecificationinJapan
_______________________________________________
transmissionrate200bps
transmittingpower75W
coverage200kmfromDGPSstation
transmissionformatITURM.8231(RTCMSC104)
messagetypeType3,7,9,16
_______________________________________________
Next,wedescribeaboutthepresentconditionfor
integrity monitor.Each header of DGPS message
includes operating condition of DGPS station. If
positionaccuracyoftheDGPSstationbecomestobe
1.5 m or more, DGPS system demands to change
DGPSfixintostandaloneGPSfix.InType9,
DGPS
systemdemandstobreakofftouseonfixcalculation
whencorrectionvalueis8mormore.
Before now, it was reported about an effect of
interference between nighttime ionospheric scatter
propagation wave and surface wave of MF beacon
wave for DGPS (Yagitani et al. 2004).They
discussed some
effects about distance from DGPS
station and other station transmitting the same
frequency,butitisdifferentfromoursubject.
In this study, one of triggers is the phenomenon
thattransmissionofdifferentialcorrectionvaluewas
interruptedbecauseofpropagationtroubleonspecific
area.AtpresentDGPSinJapanbroadcasts
Type 3,
7,9,16basedonRTCMSC104format(Kalafusetal.
1986).Update rate for all satellites in view is 45
seconds so that number of satellites in view varies.
When bit error of transmission data occurs by
propagation trouble and the correction data is not
completed,it
isshownthatdifferentialcorrectiondata
isnotupdateinthecaseofonetimedatalost.
3 ANALYSISFORPROPAGATION
CHARACTERISTIC
3.1 InCaseofBridgePier
In previous paper, we analyzed the propagation
characteristicofDGPScorrectiondatasignalnearbya
big bridge in order to investigate abnormal
propagation of MF beacon signal for DGPS.
Structure around bridge pier of big bridges at the
Inland Sea is regarded as metal screen (Araki 1977)
showninFig.1,transmittivityaroundthereisa little
over 1 %.Electric field intensity on propagation
path from DGPS stationto big bridge is
obtained in
caseofoverseaandoverlandindependentlybecause
of complex terrain (Nishitani 1980).In addition,
thereisdiffractionlossthatbridgepierisregardedas
knife edge (Shinji 1992) shown in Fig. 2, and the
diffraction loss is 10dB or more depending on
distancefrombridgepier.
551
MetalScreen
Figure1.Structureofmetalscreen
Figure2.Knifeedgediffraction
Table2.Totalelectricfieldintensity
_______________________________________________
bridge DGPS distanceelectric diffractiontotal
station (km) field loss intensity
intensity
(*) (*)(*)
_______________________________________________
KanmonWakamiya118.2 56  10.2 45.8
kyo
KanmonSeto 130.8 55  10.3 44.7
kyo
Akashi‐Oohama195.6 50  12.3 37.7
Kaikyo
Akashi‐Muroto‐170.4 52  12.1 39.9
Kaikyo Misaki
_______________________________________________
(*):dBμV/m
Figure3. Electric field intensity when passing through the
bridge(leveldowncase)
ModulationsystemofMFbeaconwaveforDGPS
is MSK (Minimum Shift Keying).Electric field
intensityisneeded40dBμV/mnottooccurtwicebit
errorper1wordthatbiterrorcorrectingcannotwork
(Saito 1996).Table 2 shows calculation results of
electricfieldintensitynearbybridgepier.In
thecase
of AkashiKaikyo Bridge, if beacon receiver uses
DGPS station in Table 2, electricfieldintensityis 40
dBμV/morlessandalwaysthereisapossibilitythat
DGPScorrectiondataismissedonetime.
Inpreviouspaper,thereisapossibilitythatDGPS
correction data signal
causes bit error, and it is
confirmed that there is a possibility that adequate
position accuracy cannot be obtained (Okuda et al.
2011).Fig.3 shows measuringdata of electricfield
intensitymeasurementnearbyAkashiKaikyoBridge
on November 2010.It was measured approximate
3dB decrease data at passing through the
bridge.
BecausemeasuredsignalfromEsakistationwhichis
very near from AkashiKaikyo Bridge has large
intensity, 3dB reduction does not occur some
problem. However, when Esaki station signal is not
utilizedbysomereasonswhichismissingtotransmit
etc., in case of using MurotoMisaki station signal
user’sshipsailsontheextendedlineofbridgepier,so
thatitmaybeoccurredsomeproblemtofixposition.
These relationship and directions of transmission
fromDGPSstationsareshowninFig.4.
Figure4.GeometricrelationwithDGPSstationandAkashi
KaikyoBridge
3.2 InCaseofCenterofBridge
Now, we analyze the propagation characteristic
nearby a center of the bridge that was unsolved in
previous paper (Okuda et al. 2011).In order to
simplifythis problem, it is assumedthat in addition
surface wave the superior reflection wave which
reflectsatstructure
ofthebridgeexists.Fig.5shows
outlineofdirectionofMinamiBisanSetoBridgeand
Oohama DGPS station used on this simulation, and
trial ship sailed eastward.Fig. 6 (a) and (b) show
plane view and side view respectively indicated
propagationpathofreflectionwave.Fig.6(c)shows
an aspect of reflection around under the bridge.
Antennaheightoftrialshipusedthissimulationis10
mand bridge girder ofMinami BisanSeto Bridge is
65mabovesealevel.Fig.7showoneofnumerical
simulation results for relative value of composite
signal strength (corresponding to electric
field
intensity) with surface wave (0dB) and reflection
wave on a condition shown in Fig. 6.It was
calculatedthatreflectioncoefficientwas0.5.
552
Figure5. BisanSeto Bridge and direction of
transmission
Relative value of signal strength to exceed 0 dB
meansthatelectricfieldintensitybecomestobelarge
(toincreasesignalgain).Lessthan0dBmeansthat
electric field intensity becomes to be small (to
decrease signal gain).If it
is assumed that all of
reflection wave work as noise, maximum signal to
noise ratio is 6 dB.In this case, it is satisfied with
advicebyITUwhichrequiresthatsignaltonoiseratio
is7dBormoreinsideDGPScoverage.
Figure6(a). Propagation path of reflection wave (plane
view)
Figure6(b).Propagationpathofreflectionwave(sideview)
Figure6(c)Propagationpathofreflectionwaveunderthe
bridge
Figure7. Result of calculation for electric field intensity
(relativevalue)nearthebridge
Infact,reflectionpointisnotoneplace.Thereis
not only mirror reflection, and effects of reflection
wave decrease depending on increase of distance
fromthebridge. Ifitisassumedthattherearethese
phenomena, it is considered that composite signal
strengthhassomevariationshowninFig.8.
Fig. 9 (a) shows measuring data of electric field
intensitymeasurementwhosesituationisthesameas
thissimulation.Shiptocollectdatasailedeastward
on South BisanSeto Traffic Route.It was observed
that signal strength increased and decreased at the
frontofthebridge, andsignalstrengthincrease
5dB
above minimum value around under the bridge.
This simulation calculated using single reflection
wave, so that measured data indicated the same
tendency.To summarize, in case of sailing passing
through a center of the bridge, it is observed some
variationofelectricfieldintensityaroundthebridge.
However, when
magnitude of the va riation is less
than 7 dB against received surface wave directly,
thereisnopossibilitythatbiterroroccurs.
Figure8. Corrected result of calculation for electric field
intensity(relativevalue)nearthebridge
553
Figure9 (a). Electric field intensity at passing through the
bridge (Minami BisanSeto Bridge, using Oohama station
signal)
Figure9 (b). Electric field intensity at passing through the
bridge (AkashiKaikyo Bridge, using Oohama station
signal)
Asmoreexamples,Fig.9(b)showsthatshipsailed
westward on AkashiKaikyo Traffic Route, distance
fromOohamaDGPSstationbecametobecloseafter
passing through the AkashiKaikyo Bridge.
However,comparedwithFig9 (a),periodicvariation
of electric field intensity was not remarkable.It
might be the
boundary distance as DGPS MF radio
beaconwave.
3.3 SituationofOverseaPropagation
Weinvestigatedelectricfieldintensityperdistanceto
research an effect of relationship with oversea and
overland propagation.We measured electric field
intensity every adequate distance during sailing on
traffic route or waterway.So, its propagation was
almostoversea.Fig.10showsthatitwasappeareda
relationship with distance to intensity although
differenceat490 km places from DGPS station was
smaller than reference (Nishitani 1980). In future
study,wewillcollectelectricfieldintensityincluded
overland propagation, and try to characterize an
effectofoverland
propagation.
-30
-20
-10
0
110100
dB
Distance (km)
Electric Field Intensity
per each distance
Figure10.Electricfieldintensitypereachdistance
3.4 DiscussforOtherBridge
First, we discuss about nearby Kanmonkyo Bridge.
In the vicinity of Kanmonkyo Bridge which locates
midwaybetweenWakamiyastationandSetostation.
DGPS user utilizes either of these stations.
Wakamiya station is 12 km closer than Seto station
fromKanmonKyoBridge.Fig.11showsthat
incase
ofusingWakamiyastationon westward sailing and
incaseofusingSetostationoneastwardsailingthere
isapossibilitythataproblemoccursontheextended
line of bridge pier.Electric field intensity of DGPS
correctiondatasignalisover40dBμV/mrequiredby
DGPS
system according to estimation in previous
paper, but there is a possibility to occur bit error
whenoverlappingeachotherfactor.
Next,wediscussaboutnearbyKurushimaKaikyo
Bridge.In case of using Oohama station which is
veryclosefromKurushimaKaikyoBridge,thereisno
problemevenifdiffractionloss
bybridgepierexists.
Consequently, when it cannot be used Oohama
station,thereisapossibilitythatsameproblemoccurs
incaseofusingSetostationorEsakistation.
Itisconsideredthatabovementionedsomeeffects
of the big bridge are same as DGPS operated by
USCGwhichis
thesamesysteminJapan.Existence
of big bridge, complex terrain etc., details of DGPS
operated by USCG is not clear, but it is considered
that the Golden Gate Bridge and the Bay Bridge in
SanFranciscoBaymaybeexistedthesameproblem.
Figure11. Geometric relation with DGPS station and
KanmonkyoBridge
554
3.5 EffectofOverlandPropagationandMultipath
Signal
Experimental navigation using our training ship
KaigiMaru in July 2012 could be collected some
electric field intensity data including overland
propagation.1213 % of propagation path are on
land, which are about 6 n.m. against 50 n.m. which
are
allof propagationpath.Inthecase of300KHz
band,ifallofpropagationpathisland,itisestimated
that electric field intensity of50 n.m. path decreases
about 10 dB (Nishitani 1980).Because decreasing
electric field intensity regarding obtained data by
experimental navigation is approximately 1 dB,
normalsailingontrafficrouteisnoproblem.
Itwas compared with datafor mooring atFukae
pierofKobeportandsailingonKobeairportoff,soit
was observed that electric field intensity decreased
about 2 dB and data fluctuation is slightly large on
mooring at Fukae shown in
Fig. 12(a), (b).It is
considered that 2 dB decreasing of electric field
intensityare to be 5 n.m. distance longer than Kobe
AirportofffromEsakistationwhichwasusedstation
ofDGPSandratioofoverlandpropagationare59%,
thatincludes80 %urbanarea.Butdata
fluctuation
atFukaeisalittlelessthan3dBbecausethereisno
large construction near Fukae pier.Nearby
KanmonKyo, electric field intensity of Diffraction
lossgeneratedarea446dBμV/mshowninsection3.1
andTable2.Consequently,iftherearesomeeffects
of multipath signal,
then electric field intensity
becomestobelessthan40dBμV/m,sothatbiterror
occurs and data of DGPS will have a trouble to
receivebyoccurringbiterror.Thereisapossibility
to be large effect of multipath by gantry crane at
containeryardexceptaneffect
ofbigbridge. Inthe
caseofinsideport,therearesomeproblemwhenpier
docking and undocking.However, investigating
minutely of effect of multipath by calculation for
intensity ratio of direct and reflection signal is
physicallyimpossible.Inthecaseofexistingmulti
path, it is considered that receiving
signal level is
more than 1 Hz frequency, so we need to review
methods for data collectionandanalyzing,and then
theyarefuturetasks.
Figure 12(a) Sample of Including Much Overland
Propagation
Figure12(b)SampleofNormalSailing
4 CONCLUSION
Weleadedtothepropagationcharacteristicarounda
center of the bridge to apply simplified reflection
wave.The result almost corresponds to measuring
data of electric field intensity.To utilize this
simulationresultsandsomeeffectsofdiffractionloss
by bridge pier becomes to be able to examine
receiving
condition of DGPS station.When DGPS
user cannot utilize the DGPS station which is close
andhassufficientsignalstrength, or when to obtain
position is insufficiency from the beginning, it is
confirmedthattoenterontheextendedlineofbridge
pier is that bit error may occur and
there is a
possibility that it cannot fix accurate position.
Furthermore we measured electric field intensity at
everyeachdistancefromDGPSstationtoresearchan
effectofoverlandpropagation.
Finally, as stated above, there is some possibility
that DGPS correction signal have been occurred bit
errorcausedbydecreasingelectric
fieldintensityand
level fluctuation by multipath, etc. nearby large
construction such as big bridge including overland
propagation, so there are some case that normal
DGPS position accuracy cannot obtain.Hereafter,
high accuracy position fix on pier docking and
undockingisessentialtoexecutesafetyandefficiently
navigation for
navigator using DGPS.
Consequently, we have toclarify these phenomenon
and consider countermeasures.In this paper, it is
suggestedthattherearenotonlyeffectofbigbridge
butalsoeffectoflargeconstructionnearpier,andwe
show necessity to investigate minutely an effect of
multipath.
REFERENCES
Araki,T.1977,DenjiBougaitoBousiTaisaku,TokyoDenki
UniversityPress,138139
DepartmentofDefense,DepartmentofHomelandSecurity
and Department of Transportation: 2008 Federal
RadionavigationPlan,2008
Japan Coast Guard DGPS center, http://www.
kaiho.mlit.go.jp/syoukai/soshiki/toudai/dgps/menu.htm
Kalafus,R.M.,Dierendonck,A.J.VAN&Pealer,N.A.
1986, Special
Committee 104 Recommendations for
Differential GPS Service, The Institute of Navigation,
GlobalPositioningSystemVolumeIII,101116
Nishitani, Y. 1980, Hakuyou Denshi Kougaku Gairon,
SeizannDo,174175
Okuda,S.&Arai,Y.2011.ThePositionAccuracyofDGPS
Affected by the Propagation Characteristic on MF
Beacon Wave, 2011 International
Technical Meeting,
718724January2426
Okuda, S., Toba, M. & Arai, Y. 2012. The Propagation
CharacteristicofDGPSCorrectionDataSignalinJapan
Propagation Characteristic near Big Bridge‐, 2012
InternationalTechnicalMeeting,13831389,January2931
Shinji, M. 1992, Musen Tsuushin no Denpa Denpan, The
Instituteof
Electronics,InformationandCommunication
Engineers,2549
Saito,Y.1996, Digital Modulation TechniquesforWireless
Communications, The Institute of Electronics,
InformationandCommunicationEngineers,70107
Yagitani,S.,Nagano,I.,Tabata,T.,Yamagata,K.,Iwasaki,T.
& Isamu Matsumoto, I. 2004, Nighttime Ionospheric
Propagation of MF Radio Waves Used for DGPS
Comparison between Observation and Theory‐, IEICE
Transactions on Communications, Vol. J87B, No. 12,
20292037