data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51971/519718b91263570590e337a10c11aef6dba39d61" alt=""
634 mm and September 2010: 463 mm. Wave
climate is also considered.
7 CONCLUSIONS
Considering the awareness about the importance of
climate changes impacts in a coastal area prone to
extreme flood and erosion events, important issues
to support confidence, or not, to the decision of
construct two jetties (rigid structures) solution,
maintenance dredging (flexible solution), or non
intervention in the waterway are:
− 1. There is an overall sea level rising trend, which
matches with the IPCC forecasting; 2. LLW has
the highest rate of linear tidal rising (75
cm/century); 3. There is an overall tidal range re-
duction; 4. The tidal prism will change, and the
tidal currents velocity should increase, if the
HHW levels will drown large fluvial areas, com-
pensating the velocity reduction due to the tidal
range decreasing; 5. Considering the issues
above, the river bar depth should increase and 6.
The overall rise of the sea will produce more
coastal erosion and littoral drift, in opposition to
the outcome of issue 5.
− It is possible to observe a general significant
height and average period wave increasing for
annual averaged figures over than 1.5 m and 8.0
s, and the corresponding decadal maximum wave,
from 3.9 m and 13.0 s in the sixties to 4.5 m and
14.5 s in the nineties. It means increasing swell.
Hence, should be a trend to increase littoral drift,
reducing bar depth.
− There are some areas of mud, which may be fluid
sufficient to consider the nautical bottom concept
(PIANC et al. 1997), in practice for mud density
lower than 1250 kg/m
3
. In these cases it is possi-
ble to reduce the under keel clearance. The analy-
sis of September 2010 and March 2011 survey,
with detailed samples of the bar and bathymetry,
should provide confidence for this answer.
− About the thalweg shifting migration, it is possi-
ble to conclude: 1. Like for the monsoon weather,
the main channel alignment depends upon flood
periods, according to rain rate of; 2. The shifting
between two adjacent thalwegs may be produced
by extreme river flow conditions, or a storm
surge.
Awareness with climate changes impacts
importance for the intervention’s plan must be
considered to obtain a final balanced solution among
structures, dredging and non structural measures for
nautical master plan.
It is important to recognize that great natural
events are not avoidable, but great disasters are, as
the ancient Greek Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) said, “It
is probable that the improbable will happen” (Kron
2008). Unfortunately, closing this paper, we have to
recognize this historical truth: in January 2011, a
very large debris-flow phenomena (more than 600
mm rain rate in two days) in the Serra do Mar
mountains of Rio de Janeiro State (Brazil), which
border São Paulo State, killed more than 700 people,
being considered by the ONU the eighth of this type
since 1900.
We want to provide an intervention’s plan for
Juqueriquerê Waterway for the next 50 years about
geomorphologic, structural and no-structural
hydraulic shape in reference to: 1. Plani-altimetric
historical evolution analysis of the coastal thalweg,
validating migration model considering wave
climate, tides and fluvial discharges; 2.
Morphological analysis of bankfull, floodplains and
perifluvial areas; 3. Grain size analysis of
transported sediments; 4. Meteorological and
oceanographic analysis (Pezzoli et al. 2004a and
2004b; Cristofori et al. 2004) 5. Hydraulic analysis
by using software HEC_RAS of US Army Corps of
Engineers. After, we want to draft a maintenance
plan for Juqueriquerê Waterway reckoning on the
basis: 1. Ordinary maintenance isn’t replaceable
with structures; 2. Maintenance actions must be
specific, pointed and planned; 3. Maintenance works
must be well-according with landscape and with the
ecosystem.
Figure 5. Destruction in the dock area and Packing House of
English Farm after the debris flow of March 1967.
575