253
2.3 Analysis of the text of the STCW’95 and
STCW’2010 Code
Comparing specification of minimum standard of
competence for officers in charge of an engineering
watch listed in Table A-III/1, it is possible to find in
the STCW’95 Code only one standard: “Operate al-
ternators, generators and control systems”, in the
STCW’2010 Code there are two:
“Operate electrical, electronic and control systems”
and “Maintenance and repair of electrical and elec-
tronic equipment”.
In the STCW’95 Code these two standards of
competence belonged to chief engineer officers and
second engineer officers. It means that in the
STCW’2010 Code the requirements for watchkeep-
ing engineers are much higher than before. The con-
tents of the second column (K.U.P.) of the table A-
III/1 in the STCW’95 and STCW’2010 Code shows
how big is the difference.
The chief engineer officers and second engineer
officers in the STCW’2010 Code have two standards
of competence:
“Manage operation of electrical and electronic
control equipment” and “Manage troubleshooting,
restoration of electrical and electronic control
equipment to operating condition”. It means that
now they are not obliged to operate or maintain and
repair of electrical, electronic and control equip-
ment, as it was before, now it is a job of watchkeep-
ing engineers.
It is interesting to compare the competences
and K.U.P.s of engineer officers and electro-
technical officers in the wake of the Manila amend-
ments to the STCW Code [4].
A short comparison of competencies leads to
conclusion, that engineer officers are obliged to
know how to operate, maintain and repair all electri-
cal, electronic and control systems onboard the ship.
The electro-technical officers should know how
to monitor, maintain and repair the systems men-
tioned above and to operate only generators and dis-
tribution systems below and in excess of 1000 V.
With regard to overview of K.U.P.s of both kinds
of officers under consideration results that for com-
petence “Operate electrical, electronic and control
systems” the requirements listed in K.U.P. column
of Table A-III/1 for engineer officers are more de-
tailed than for electro-technical officers.
Concluding, engineer officers competencies and
K.U.P.s are comparable and sometimes more exactly
described in detailed aspects than appropriate re-
quirements for electro-technical officers.
That’s why the validation of existing model train-
ing courses:
− 7.02 Chief and 2nd Engineer Officer,
− 7.04 Officer in Charge of an Engineering Watch
is very important and should take into account all
these new requirements provided in the
STCW’2010 Code.
The authors are of the opinion, that it would be
very difficult to meet these requirements without
significant increase in the duration of the model
courses, especially of the last one.
REFERENCES
[1] Are engineers getting the electrical training they need? In
Marine Engineering Review, March 2006, p. 35-36.
[2] Wyszkowski J. et al. 2009. Novelties in the development of
the qualification standards for Electro-Technical Officers
under STCW Convention requirements. In proc. 8th Inter-
national Navigational Symposium on Marine Navigation
and Safety of Sea Transportation, Trans-Nav, Gdynia,
2009.
[3] STCW Convention. Final Act of the 1995 Conference of
Parties to the International Convention on Standards of
Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers,
1978.
[4] STCW CONF.2-DC-2 - Adoption of the final act and any
instruments, resolutions and recommendations resulting
from the work of the conference. Draft resolution 2. Adop-
tion of amendment to the seafarers’ training, certification
and watchkeeping (STCW) Code, 2010.
.