146
Due to logistical limitations to access large ceta-
ceans, we prioritized two field sites to collect vocali-
zations from Bryde’s whales (Balaenoptera edeni)
and sperm whales, which were located in the neritic
waters off Kochi (Tosa Bay; approx. 33N–133E)
and in the waters off the southern coast of Chichi-
jima Island (Bonin Islands; 27N-142.2E), respective-
ly, which are promising locations to access these ce-
tacean species. As reported in Yamada et al. (2011),
the observed ranges of vocal frequencies were 1.90-
4.80 kHz and 0.15-0.40 kHz for sperm and Bryde’s
whales, respectively (Table 2). As both upper values
for the vocal frequencies of the two species are
higher than the reported values presented in Fig. 1,
this finding may allow the signals emitted by UWS
to be modified for increased efficacy.
Although vocal frequencies provide indirect evi-
dence of the audible (frequency) range, more direct
measurements clearly represent a more suitable ap-
proach in the context of UWS. Yamada et al. (2011)
also reported the predicted audible range for several
large cetaceans determined using an anatomical ap-
proach of the inner ear: 0.12-15.00 kHz and 0.11-
31.10 kHz for the common minke and Baird’s
beaked whale, respectively (Table 3). Due to differ-
ences in the species examined, the values estimated
using this approach cannot be directly compared to
those of the vocal frequency estimated in the field
surveys. However, as similarities in vocal character-
istics are generally expected among related taxon
groups (Fig. 1), comparisons among Balaenoptera
species (common minke whale - Bryde’s whales)
would appear to be valid.
Table 3. Predicted audible ranges for the common minke and
Baird’s beaked whales based on anatomical approaches using
the inner ear (from Yamada et al., 2011).
__________________________________________________
Sampling location Species Predicted
frequency (kHz)
__________________________________________________
Off Ishinomaki, Common minke whale 0.12 - 15.93
Miyagi, Japan
(Balaenoptera acutorostrata)
(Pacific coast) Mysticeti (baleen whales)
Off Wadaura Baird's beaked whale 0.27 - 33.09
Chiba, Japan
(Berardius bairdii),
(Pacific coast) Odontoceti (toothed whales)
__________________________________________________
From the reported literature, it was confirmed that
the audible range is wider than that of the vocal fre-
quency range, indicating that cetaceans can hear
sounds of higher frequency than of their own vocali-
zations, at least among Balaenoptera cetaceans and
also likely among Mysticeti cetaceans. Although the
obtained evidence is not strong enough to reach a
firm conclusion, this nature of cetaceans (i.e, audible
range > vocal frequency range) is likely also true
among Odontoceti species, as determined from the
comparison between the vocal frequency of sperm
whales and the audible range of Baird’s beaked
whale. As a further step for reducing risk of colli-
sions between HF and cetaceans, this rationale can
be implied for the improvement of UWS.
4 SHORT-TERM PROPOSAL FOR IMPROVE-
MENT OF UWS
To minimize risks for both HF vessels and ceta-
ceans, we are presently preparing interim proposals
for improving specifications of UWS by taking into
account the results of the present project; these im-
provements are ongoing and are halfway complete.
First, it is necessary to adjust the sounds generat-
ed by UWS using appropriate acoustic specifications
of the high-risk cetacean species for which sudden
collisions are to be avoided. We have already identi-
fied the critical cetacean species to be sperm whales
and Bride’s whales in the Tokyo-Izu-Ohshima sea
route, and common minke whales in the Niigata-
Ryotsu sea route. For the seas routes in other locali-
ties, identification of the critical species through ce-
tacean sighting surveys is an essential first step.
For the improvement of UWS, it is of critical im-
portance to identify the most effective sound fre-
quency to repel the critical cetaceans. In this regard,
Yamada et al. (2011) suggested that existing UWS
(operating at 6-20 kHz) should be modified to pro-
duce frequencies less than 15 kHz for common min-
ke whales, less than 0.4 kHz for Bryde’s whales, and
less than 4.8 kHz for middle to large-toothed whales,
such as sperm whales. However, it is unknown
whether such modification is technically feasible, or
if installation of the necessary hardware is realistic.
Therefore, more investigations are needed to better
estimate the audible range for critical cetacean spe-
cies, and to determine the required technical and
mechanical improvements of UWS. Particularly, an
increased number of anatomical inner ear samples is
expected to help clarify the audible range and effec-
tive frequency for deterring high-collision-risk ceta-
cean species.
5 FUTURE CHALLENGES AND POTENTIAL
APPLICATIONS
In the course of our investigations and research for
the improvement of UWS, specific challenges for
future research have been identified. We previously
attempted to introduce high-definition cameras to
improve the accuracy of identifying whale species,
but a new technique for obtaining high-quality im-
ages has emerged that might contribute to the early
detection of whales, as well as allow the more accu-
rate identification of cetacean species.