113
from and in areas, where local authorities have little
or no power (central or south Somalia), because it
allows them not to spend any money on bribes,
which means more money to share. The money from
the ransom, after paying all costs, is divided between
the group that directly attacked the vessel and the
group that guarded it afterwards. Hijackers get more
than the guards. However, the highest share goes to
the first person that boards the ship. The myths of pi-
racy in the greater Gulf of Aden are many, but the
average pirate group is a clan-based, low-tech group,
consisting of former fishermen
19
.
Statistics show that the aim of Somali pirates be-
come all types of ships, their size is not able to dis-
courage piracy. On the contrary, the larger vessels,
the greater the risk, that they become the target of an
attack. Hijacking of a large enterprise, carrying ex-
pensive goods entails huge profits for the snatchers,
which obtain in exchange for the release of the crew
and the ship. In 2008 in the Gulf of Aden and Soma-
lia it could be noticed the largest, as yet, increase of
tankers hijackings, carried out in a very large dis-
tance from the land, along the East coast of Africa.
The purpose of each attack is to occupy a ship, but
not every attack is successful one as mentioned be-
fore. Every vessel with varying speed and low side
becomes a potential attack target
20
.
The report from 2008 with 111 incidents shows
how dangerous area for navigation is the Gulf of
Aden and the East coast of Somalia. The number of
attacks in this area increased by approximately
250% compared with the year 2007 and 2005 (no-
ticed accordingly, 44 and 45 attacks) and approxi-
mately five times in comparison with the year 2006
(only 20). The number of attacks in August 2008 on-
ly, at 19, and rising in November and October 15
and 16, respectively
21
. In 2009 there were 217 ships
attacked with 47 vessels hijacked Somalia accounts
for more than half of the 2009 figures. 2009 has
however seen a significant shift in the area of attacks
off Somalia. While the 2008 attacks were predomi-
nantly focused in the Gulf of Aden, 2009 has wit-
nessed more vessels also being targeted along the
east coast of Somalia
22
. According to IMB reports in
the first half of 2010 there were 100 armed attacks
reported off the coast of Somalia including 27 vessel
hijackings
23
. The profits which the pirates make with
the money are enormous for them, therefore, aban-
19
Hansen S. J., op.cit., 41.
20
Trapla M., Metody zwiększania bezpieczeństwa statku w kon-
tekście wzrostu piractwa, Master’s thesis, Naval University,
44, Gdynia 2010.
21
Reports on Acts of Piracy..., op.cit., 27.
22
2009 worldwide piracy figures surpass 400, http://www.icc-
ccs.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=
385:2009-worldwide-piracy-figures-surpass-
400&catid=60:news&Itemid=51, 22.11.2010.
23
A new anti-piracy bible...,op. cit., 22.
doning this activity in the country without prospects
is practically only a wishful thinking.
5 PIRACY THE THREAT TO MARITIME
TRANSPORTATION
Piracy in Somalia is a much greater threat than it
might seem. The international community tackling
this problem must bear in mind each potential haz-
ard resulting from piracy. This threat can be classi-
fied in three aspects:
− the importance of piracy for international trade,
and in particular the transport of oil;
− the danger for the environment;
− the potential terrorist threat.
Safety at sea has been seriously jeopardized in re-
cent years, thanks to the emergence of incidents of
piracy in key and strategic transit points, which un-
doubtedly the Gulf of Aden is. In addition to the di-
rect impact on vessels, crew, cargo, as well as the
maritime industry, piracy threatens worldwide
commercial marine. Obviously, it is crucial that
firms, which delays with the delivery of goods to the
port of destination, will be losing money. Adding to
this the costs paid in ransoms, piracy should be no-
ticed as a serious threat to the trade from an econom-
ic point of view. The cost of freight rose from
Rs4,000 ($132) to Rs5,600 ($ 185) for a 20ft con-
tainer and Rs8,000 ($ 265) to Rs11,200 ($370) for a
40ft container. The line justified the tariff by citing a
persistent risk of pirate attacks
24
. As it shows these
consequences are not limited only to companies,
whose vessels are hijacked but there are also serious
concerns of the increase in costs of insurance premi-
ums for vessels intending to go through the Gulf of
Aden. Their growth, is not only caused by an ongo-
ing risk of war, but also dramatically increasing
number of hijacked units. During 2008, insurance
premiums were raised ten times
25
. It is estimated
that for the increasing number of passing vessels on
that route the cost of insurance from the risk of war
for 20,000 ships can reach even 109 400 million dol-
lars. If the costs of an additional insurance become
too burdensome for the company, or the transition
by the Gulf of Aden seems too dangerous, the deci-
sion is taken about extension of the routes to Europe
and North America, bypassing the Cape of Good
Hope. Companies increasingly decide to bear higher
costs associated with the time of arrival at the port of
24
Pirate range ever more vast, Safety at Sea, November 2010,
vol. 44 no 501, 12.
25
Costello M., Shipping insurance costs soars with piracy
surge off Somalia, The Times,
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_se
ctors/banking_and_finance/article4727372.ece/.,
11.09.2008.