450
new graduates are always questioned. One of the is-
sues is the competency of the teachers. These teach-
ers have not recently disembarked from the vessel.
So, their knowledge and skills as far as new vessels
are concerned are not adequate to teach these stu-
dents. Teachers are not updated. The competency of
the supply at the end of the three (3) academic years
of the students is always questioned by the industry.
For a company like K-Line with a training center,
we augment whatever inadequacy in the skills of the
students by giving them the training necessarily re-
quired in the type of vessel they will be joining. As
far as this company is concerned, we don’t assign
any anybody on board unless he is trained and ready
for the job because the confidence of the seafarers
even if he is just a cadet is important when he goes
on board. He should be able to know the job re-
quired of him. And to those with no training center,
that would be a very great factor.
She added: “The problem before was always the
engine shortage on the engine department. At this
point, this is gradually addressed by the school.
There must be a balance. The reason for this is that
there is a need of a ‘bridging program’, in order to
augment the shortage of the supply in the engine de-
partment especially the engine officers. K-Line is
the first company to initiate or introduce the bridg-
ing program (mechanical engineering to marine en-
gineering) because [SIC] we are now in the third
year. In 2005, we had the first batch of 18 marine of-
ficers.”
Before putting up the training center, Global
Training Systems, Inc., of which he is president,
Capt. Jose Martinez, a research master mariner, had
this to say:
“The instructors are the sole instruments on the
education of the students. It is from them that the
students hear everyday. In [SIC] everything that they
do they must do it well and learn to love it. If they
love what they are doing, everybody they shared
with [SIC] will also love what you are doing. They
have to inspire the students; always give their best in
teaching. The English language is very important
because this is needed in the profession. Even when
students are good in doing the job it is necessary to
explain the what, how and why it needs to be done.
If you cannot express yourself in English, then it
might lead to serious consequences. But if you are
conversant in the language then you have an edge.”
Mrs. Brenda Panganiban had this to say: “I be-
lieve that your school has some qualifying examina-
tion. I think that your school should also administer
an aptitude test for the marine profession so that you
will be able to determine who among the current
students are fit to continue in the course. Maybe it
can be done after one year, after taking a general
course just like in the nursing or medical profession.
[SIC]The minds of the students in the higher level
now who passed the aptitude test must be condi-
tioned that they are educated and trained to become
officers. [SIC] They should be guided in the way
they talk; act, and interact with people. The charac-
ter, the attitude and the whole personality must be
developed. In school it must be emphasized that to
become an officer you maintain humility regardless
of how far you have gone or become. It is also im-
portant to develop the spirituality of the students be-
cause when your spirit is strong, your mind and
body will be strong as well.
Mr. Ericson Marquez, President of Pilipinas
Crown Maritime said: “The source of knowledge
will be the schools. But if you continue to produce
less and less competent graduates, then 20% are only
qualified. Then, ‘wala tayong pupuntahan talaga’
(we are going nowhere). What is our response? Last
year, we did an assessment (MSAP-Maritime
Schools Assessment Program). We know which
schools can produce how much. We know some
school cannot even produce a single applicant to
pass our standard. Our standard is not very high. We
use criterion reference in establishing the standard.
Last year we had a pilot test on this activity. This
[SIC] February1 and 2, we expect that CHED will
issue a memorandum for all the schools to partici-
pate. Last year JBLFMU did not participate for you
had an activity on that day. [SIC] We hope this year
you will participate, not that we doubt the quality of
your students but we are using the better schools as
the benchmark for other schools. Last time we used
MAAP as our benchmark, MAAP participated.
[SIC] The ninety-four students of MAAP were all on
top, only 1 or 2 were not in the top 100. You can im-
agine how many percent it is as against 56 scholars
who participated.”
He also narrated: “Last year, we did not promise
any incentive for those who performed well, but this
year we will. We have already obtained 200 scholar-
ships from OWWA at Php 30,000 each scholar. So,
its [SIC] 30,000 each for 100 deck cadets and 100
engine cadets. The grant will be given on their third
year. This money will not be paid to them. They
cannot be a grantee if they are not a relative of a
seaman or they have contributed to the fund. Our
agreement is to get the 200 scholars and will [SIC]
pay the contribution. Later, the OWWA will refund
us. This is open to everybody except for MAAP,
PMMA and NSA cadets. This Php 30,000 grant will
be added with incentives because we were able to
convince Japanese ship owners. We are telling the
schools, on the basis of the assessment as endorsed
by the Commission on Higher Education (CHED);
they can prepare a program to prepare them as rat-
ings instead of an officer. They must be taught cook-
ing, ship painting, ship maintenance and welding