923
The method employed in this study was
qualitative to capture the essence of transformation of
these seafarers or marine officers who wanted to
become “researchers” and the suggested activities
which would enhance their research capability at the
maritime university, JBLFMU-Molo, Iloilo City,
Philippines. The researchers also utilized texts – both
written and oral to capture the respondents’
experiences. Interviews with the respondents were
employed as part of the oral document. The written
and oral texts contained the different experiences and
exposure of the marine engine officers who had been
on board for quite a number of years but are now
engaged in the research activities of the JBLFMU
(John B. Lacson Foundation Maritime University) -
Molo, Iloilo City. The written texts showcased the
experiences of respondents for collecting data and
presenting studies in the different at national and
international fora and conferences. The researcher
attempted to highlight the “transformation” that
occurred shared by the officers on board who turned
into “researchers” and instructors in the maritime
university specifically JBLFMU-Molo, Iloilo City.
Framing is the theoretical grounding that this
researcher had utilized to make sense of the different
texts.
The respondents of this study were the ten (10)
marine engineers who were teaching professional
subjects at the maritime university, John B. Lacson
Maritime University-Molo for quite number of years.
6 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Ten (10) marine engineering officers were utilized as
respondents of this investigation. The marine officers
are coded as O1 to O10 for the purposes of discussion.
Neil Ellis of the Seafarers International Research
Centre shed some light on the role of maritime
researchers at SIRC’s website: www.sirc.cf.ac.uk . He
emphasized that seafarers are encouraged to formally
take part in research studies that take place in their
sector, no matter who conducts them. It is only by
actually taking part that their voices can be heard, and
to think that they have some very valuable
contributions to make to the range of debates in which
maritime sector members engage. Based on the data
generated for this purpose, the researcher decided to
tackle the experiences, challenges, benefits, and
activities of the marine officers towards the
development of their research capabilities.
6.1 Experiences of the Marine Officers as Researchers in
the Maritime University (JBLFMU-Molo)
O1’s experience as a researcher has been marked with
excitement and challenges. He said “I have learned to
do the process of interviewing and document
analyzing. I had interviewed welders and technical
workers at Subic Shipyard and I enjoyed gathering
information on ship building and repair.”
O2 has basically highlighted his experience in the
monitoring of sea grass by identifying the type of sea
grasses and other dominant species in the area,
measuring the height of the grasses in every quadrat,
getting pictures, biomass, specimens for laboratory
testing, and measuring sea grass’ density.
O3 says that “exchanging my ideas on issues,
concerns, and trends in education, maritime
regulations in research, and other environmental
concerns had greatly helped me.”
O4 emphasized his experience on dealing with
scientific procedures in the discovery of new
knowledge. He adds that application of the different
steps in conducting researches, both quantitative and
qualitative has contributed to his research experience.
O5 says “enhancement of my skills and knowledge
in understanding the research process and
determination of scientific data needed in the research
activity.”
O6 writes “proper identification of the research
problem specifically dealing with maritime education
and training. I learned the skills of interviewing and
other rudiments of conducting tracer studies.”
O7 stresses that his exposure to the world of
research has contributed to him both as a teacher and
at the same time a marine officer. My new knowledge
in science and technology has been translated into
more valuable output.
Table 1 contains the experiences of the
respondents.
Table 1. Experiences of the Marine Officers as Researchers in
the Maritime University (JBLFMU-Molo)
________________________________________________
Respondent Experiences
________________________________________________
Officer 1 Process of interviewing and document
(O1) analyzing. I had interviewed welders and
technical workers at Subic Shipyard and I
enjoyed gathering information on ship
building and repair.
Officer 2 Monitoring sea grass by identifying the type
(O2) of sea grasses and other dominant species in
the area, measuring the height of the grasses
in every quadrat, getting pictures, biomass,
specimens for laboratory testing, and
measuring sea grass’ density.
Officer 3 Exchanging my ideas on issues, concerns, and
(O3) trends in education, maritime regulations in
research, and other environmental concerns.
Officer 4 Dealing with scientific procedures in the
(O4) discovery of new knowledge. Application of
the different steps in conducting researches,
both quantitative and qualitative.
Officer 5 Enhancement of my skills and knowledge in
(O5) understanding the research process and
determination of scientific data needed in the
research activity.
Officer 6 Proper identification of the research problem
(O6) specifically dealing with maritime education
and training. I learned the skills of
interviewing and other rudiments of
conducting tracer studies.
Officer 7 Exposure to the world of research has
(O7) contributed to me both as a teacher and at the
same time a marine officer. My new
knowledge in science and technology has
been translated into more valuable output.
Officer 8 Conduct and experience research despite my
(O8) limited background and exposure in it. I
learned the art of technology like internet
surfing, and finding related data that are
useful in my inquiry.
Officer 9 Determining adversity quotient is a big