664
brightness, and the a* and b* components, describing
the share of green and red, as well as yellow and blue,
respectively. The brightness of the color expressed as
the L* parameter assumes a value of 0 for black and
100 for white. The brightness of the tested sea salts
expressed by the L* parameter varied in a wide range
from 61.85 to 89.25 (Table 6). The salt of Laeso Sal
(VIII) was closest to the white color, while the
Himalayan salt (IX) was closest to the gray color.
Table 6. Color parameters of the studied sea salts
_______________________________________________
Salt Color measurement in the CIELAB system (
)
code L* parameter a* parameter b* parameter
no.
_______________________________________________
I 65.11 ± 0.505 –0.18 ± 0.025 1.05 ± 0.017
II 78.50 ± 1.633 –0.10 ± 0.036 0.29 ± 0.026
III 68.80 ± 0.417 –0.15 ± 0.019 0.41 ± 0.048
IV 72.45 ± 0.407 0.06 ± 0.026 1.40 ± 0.113
V 81.61 ± 0.702 –0.30 ± 0.022 0.86 ± 0.040
VI 69.80 ± 0.262 –0.24 ± 0.053 0.39 ± 0.064
VII 73.90 ± 0.407 –0.23 ± 0.024 0.80 ± 0.042
VIII 82.80 ± 0.603 –0.51 ± 0.012 2.54 ± 0.081
IX 64.60 ± 1.273 –0.22 ± 0.071 0.99 ± 0.292
_______________________________________________
Abbreviation: S – standard deviation
Source: Elaboration based on own data
The a* parameter ranged from –0.51 to 0.39. This
parameter indicates the color saturation from green
(negative values) to red (positive values). The tested
salts do not contain compounds which color lies on
the color axis from green to red. Negative values for
green and low indications of the share of red in
shaping the color of the final product indicate the
absence of other compounds that could affect the
appearance of such shades in the tested salts.
The value of the b* parameter ranged from 0.26 to
2.54. This parameter tells about the color saturation
from blue (–) to yellow (+). The results of the color
measurement indicate that the color of the studied
salts is dominantly white with a slight shade of gray
and a slight yellow tint.
Research on the color of salt was carried out for
table salts [21] and showed that the color of the salt
may be affected by the geological conditions in which
the deposits were formed and by the presence of
various types of contaminants in the form of
coexistence of other compounds. The salt deposits are
not only made up of pure sodium chloride and that is
why we observe such a large variation in the color of
the salt as yellow, pink or blue.
Drake and Drake [7], studying the composition of
sea salts from different parts of the world, also found
that sea salts appeared in various colors, such as
white, gray, black, pink, peach and brown-red, and
the color depended on mineral impurities absorbed
from surroundings. For example, black salts got their
color by adding activated carbon. The color of pink
Himalayan salt comes from trace amounts of iron.
During transport and storage, the color of the salt
should be monitored, as under the influence of factors
such as temperature and humidity, the color may
change.
4 CONCLUSIONS
In the light of the conducted research, more attention
should be paid to the informative aspect of the salt
packaging. This issue is important for the final
consumers of the product.
The regulations concerning the addition of iodine
compounds to sea salt and the determination of the
iodine content in sea salt require standardization.
The studied coarse-grained sea salts were
characterized by low water activity, which proves a
well-conducted crystallization process and
subsequent distribution processes.
Particle size distribution, as well as the values of
the static and kinetic angle of repose allow to classify
the studied salts as moderately loose materials.
Water activity, as well as particle size distribution
and angle of repose are crucially important
parameters from the point of view of transportation of
a solid bulk cargo such as salt.
The studied sea salts were characterized by an
even white color with a shade of gray or a slight
yellow tint.
REFERENCES
1. Bandara, B.E.S., De Silva, D.A.M., Maduwanthi, B.C.H.,
Warunasinghe, W.A.A.I.: Impact of Food Labeling
Information on Consumer Purchasing Decision: With
Special Reference to Faculty of Agricultural Sciences.
Procedia Food Science. 6, 309–313 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2016.02.061.
2. CIE, Colorimetry: Official recommendations of the
International Commission on Illumination. , CIE Central
Bureau, Vienna (1986).
3. Commission Regulation (EC) No 417/2008 of 8 May
2008: amending Annexes I and II to Council Regulation
(EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical
indications and designations of origin for agricultural
products and foodstuffs. (2008).
4. Dasgupta, P.K., Liu, Y., Dyke, J.V.: Iodine nutrition:
iodine content of iodized salt in the United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 42, 4, 1315–1323 (2008).
https://doi.org/10.1021/es0719071.
5. Delahaye, F.: Should we eat less salt? Archives of
Cardiovascular Diseases. 106, 5, 324–332 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2013.01.003.
6. Domian, E., Szymanski, P.: Ściśliwość w ocenie sypkości
wybranych sypkich produktów spożywczych. Zeszyty
Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych. 558, 51–61
(2011).
7. Drake, S.L., Drake, M.A.: Comparison of salty taste and
time intensity of sea and land salts from around the
world. Journal of Sensory Studies. 26, 1, 25–34 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2010.00317.x.
8. Galvis-Sánchez, A.C., Lopes, J.A., Delgadillo, I., Rangel,
A.O.S.S.: Sea Salt. In: de la Guardia, M. and Gonzálvez,
A. (eds.) Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry. pp. 719–
740 Elsevier (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-
59562-1.00026-8.
9. Grunert, K.G., Wills, J.M., Fernández-Celemín, L.:
Nutrition knowledge, and use and understanding of
nutrition information on food labels among consumers
in the UK. Appetite. 55, 2, 177–189 (2010).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.05.045.
10. Jørgensen, N.O.: Origin of shallow saline groundwater
on the Island of Læsø, Denmark. Chemical Geology. 184,