data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27b33/27b3317c2f299bd88cbece13bb1f4726f614e271" alt=""
614
Figure 5. Average time in port [h]
The last analysed parameter give the real reason
for the increase of the overall air pollutant emission
of the international marine traffic in the 2018. As it is
visible on the Figure 6, the average size of cruise
vessels engines increased significantly from around
15000 kW to close to 20000 kW.
Figure 6. Average engine size [kW] in 2017 and 2018
This reason, together with the increased number of
cruise vessels arriving to the Port of Split caused
mentioned increase of the air pollutant emission.
7 CONCLUSION
Total air pollutant emission of international marine
traffic in Port of Split increased from 2017 to 2018 by
more than 25%. At the same time, overall number of
arrivals in the international marine traffic decreased
by 2% while stay in port changed only slightly, not
causing mentioned increase of the air pollutant
emission.
That increase is explained in the increase of the
number of overall cruise vessels arrivals in 2018,
combined with the increase of the ship and engine
size (cruise ship engine size increased by 33% in
2018).
Distribution of the air pollutant sources is in line
with above presented facts. Due to the much larger
engine size (5-10 times larger, depends of the basin)
and much larger fuel consumption, majority of the air
pollutant emission sources is concentrated in the
Gradska luka basin, where 89% of all international
marine traffic air pollutant emission was released in
2017. In 2018 that percentage increased tom 92%,
followed with the increase off the size of vessels and
respectively engines.
REFERENCES
1. COLREGS: International Regulations for Preventing
Collisions at Sea,
https://www.jag.navy.mil/distrib/instructions/COLREG-
1972.pdf, last accessed 2020/09/01.
2. Croatian Technical Encyclopedia: The Port of Split,
https://tehnika.lzmk.hr/luka-split/, last accessed
2020/08/27.
3. European Environment Agency: EMEP/EEA air
pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2016 : technical
guidance to prepare national emission inventories.
Publications Office of the European Union, Denmark
(2016).
4. Gutierrez-Torre, A., Berral, J.Ll., Buchaca, D., Guevara,
M., Soret, A., Carrera, D.: Improving maritime traffic
emission estimations on missing data with CRBMs.
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 94,
103793 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103793.
5. Miola, A., Ciuffo, B.: Estimating air emissions from
ships: Meta-analysis of modelling approaches and
available data sources. Atmospheric Environment. 45,
13, 2242–
2251 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.046.
6. Myszka, A., Kaizer, A.: Analysis of the Vessels’ Service
Time in the Port of Gdańsk, Based on the Time
Registration of Ships Entries and Departures, as a
Proposition of Multi-aspect Method of Port Monitoring.
TransNav, the International Journal on Marine
Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation. 14, 2, 465–
468 (2020). https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.14.02.26.
7. Split Maritime Pilots: https://www.splitpilot.com/copy-
of-area, last accessed 2020/09/01.
8. Split Port Authority: Port areas in which the jurisdiction
of the Port Authority Split extends,
https://portsplit.hr/en/luka-split/lucka-podrucja/, last
accessed 2020/08/27.
9. Stazić, L., Radonja, R., Pelić, V., Lalić, B.: The Port of
Split international marine traffic emissions inventory.
Pomorstvo. 34, 1, 32–39 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.31217/p.34.1.4.
10. The Port of Split: http://www.lukasplit.hr/, last accessed
2020/09/01.
11. Trozzi, C.: Emission estimate methodology for maritime
navigation. Presented at the 9th International Emissions
Inventory Conference , San Antonio, Texas, USA (2010).
12. Wahl, C., Scarbrough, T., Stavrakaki, A., Green, C.,
Squire, J., Noden, R.: UK Ship Emissions Inventory,
Final Report,
https://naei.beis.gov.uk/reports/reports?report_id=636,
last accessed 2020/09/01.