929
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Relevance of the research problem
The special geopolitical situation of Eastern Europe
from a security point of view determines the need to
be ready for joint defense having a strong and
motivated army composed of members each of whom
is a personality as a totality of all personal qualities
that define its place in the military community. In
general, personality is defined by humanistic ideals,
purposeful decision-making, quick thinking, ability to
work in a team, knowledge and application of
military equipment and technology. More
specifically, all this is defined by appropriate
personal, social, and subject competences. The
Eastern shore of the Baltic Sea is currently a field of
tension caused by information war in terms of threats
from the East, which poses a real danger of potential
war. Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia are members of
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO),
however, they are in a special military threat zone of
their eastern neighbor.
On the one hand, being a member of NATO is a
great achievement for these countries because
NATO’s purpose is to guarantee the freedom and
security of its members through political and military
means. Political means are understood in the
following way: NATO promotes democratic values
Naval Officer as a Leading Personality: Strategic
Approach and Challenges
S. Lileikis & P. Dukel
Lithuanian Maritime Academy, Klaipeda, Lithuania
ABSTRACT: The aim of this article is to consider a naval officer as a leading personality from a strategic point of
view in respect of the challenges and opportunities of professional development, by characterizing the needs
and changes of the naval officers’ profession and discussing the transition period for the training of Lithuanian
naval officers. The main methods applied to the research are scientific literature analysis, document analysis,
interpretation, and synthesis. The basic methodological principles of the research are as follows: humanism,
personalism, and cognitive psychology. The type of the research is a descriptive study. The changes, such as the
absence of a clear border between the front line of action and the back area, expression of war as a changing
and, at the same time, constant process, as well as changes in the social environment of the officer’s profession,
when the challenges are not always purely physically military in nature but also diplomatic and psychological,
require a high level of military training of naval officers. Taking into account the transition period for the
training of Lithuanian naval officers at non-foreign military academies, their professional training should be
strengthened by collaboration with the Alliance’s partners, by updating existing training programs and
coordinating them with Western military academies, which have a long tradition of training naval officers
depending on the relevant geopolitical challenges and potential threats, as well as technological and social
changes.
http://www.transnav.eu
the International Journal
on Marine Navigation
and Safety of Sea Transportation
Volume 14
Number 4
December 2020
DOI: 10.12716/1001.14.04.18
930
and enables its members to consult and cooperate on
defence and security-related issues to solve problems,
build trust and, in the long run, prevent conflict.
Military means are as follows: NATO is committed to
the peaceful resolution of disputes. If diplomatic
efforts fail, it has the military power to undertake
crisis-management operations. These are carried out
under the collective defence clause of NATO’s
founding treaty Article 5 of the Washington Treaty
or under a United Nations mandate, alone or in
cooperation with other countries and international
organizations [13].
On the other hand, it is very likely that during a
possible military conflict the local Naval Forces will
carry out tasks at the initial phase without the full
support of the Allies. Thus, they must be able to plan
and carry out tasks independently, and only naval
officers with a high level of motivation (in the broad
sense) can plan and lead.
Paying attention to the Republic of Lithuania,
represented by the authors of this article, it must be
said that the territorial sea of Lithuania, the exclusive
economic zone, and Klaipeda State Seaport are critical
territories for Lithuania. The capacity of the port
allows to quickly and efficiently provide foreign
soldiers with all the necessary means in the country.
In order to ensure the safe arrival of the Allies by sea,
it is important to develop and maintain a high level of
the Naval Flotilla and preparedness for immediate
response to possible disruptions of commercial
shipping and illegal border crossing of the Republic
of Lithuania.
However, after the Republic of Lithuania became a
member of NATO, it faced with an important
challenge the Lithuanian Naval Forces lost the
opportunity to train its officers in Western European
naval academies. As a result, this period has reduced
the scope of proper preparation for equal
participation in international exercises and operations
with Allies, and above all, the scope of development
of the qualities and values of a leader and provision
of future officers with the theoretical knowledge and
practical skills necessary to lead a combat unit.
The problems of professional training of officers,
taking into account the professional development of
the officer’s personality, are examined in various
scientific aspects, especially from a point of view of
ideology, axiology, leadership, technology,
education, (self-) development of personality,
psychological resilience, and motivation [1-5; 7-8; 10;
12; 15-17; 19-23]. The issues of organizing
professional training for naval officers and for a naval
officer as a personality have been only recently
scientifically addressed by strategically assessing the
Lithuanian military study system.
1.2 Methodology of the research
The object of the research is a naval officer as a
leading personality.
The subject of the research is the challenges of the
naval officer’s development.
The aim of the article is to consider a naval officer
as a leading personality from a strategic point of view
in respect of the challenges and opportunities of
professional development.
The tasks of the research are as follows:
1 To characterize the needs and changes of the naval
officers’ profession.
2 To discuss the transition period for training
Lithuanian naval officers.
The main methods applied to the research are
scientific literature analysis, document analysis,
interpretation, and synthesis.
The basic methodological principles of the
research are as follows:
Humanism, which is an anthropocentric
worldview that considers the human being as the
highest value on planet Earth; the value of an
individual embodies the meaning of educating
him/her by enabling him/her to express
himself/herself freely and responsibly in a society;
this worldview is a basis for a free personal
decision to become a naval officer after receiving
responsible professional training;
Personalism sees a human being as a personality
in an ontological sense with an emphasis on the
uniqueness, self-awareness, and free will of each
person; this attitude is the basis for individualized
training, as well as for self-training in respect of
gaining motivation and preparing for the naval
officer’s professional life;
Cognitive psychology highlights the possibilities
of personal consciousness and cognition by
making the directions of personal self-
development and person’s professional expression
relevant, meaningful and changeable; cognitive
psychology methodologically bases a possibility
for professional education and training of naval
officers and purposeful organization thereof.
The type of the research is a descriptive study.
2 RESULTS OF THE RESEARCH
2.1 Needs and changes of the naval officers’ profession
The modern environment of military operations is
characterized by the absence of a clear border
between the front line of action and the back area.
This result in uncertain, ambiguous, complex,
volatile, and frequently changing situations and
environment in which a soldier or military unit has to
operate.
In addition, the social environment of the
profession of a soldier, and especially an officer has
changed. The nature of the problems and challenges
faced by the army and its leadership is not exclusively
physically military. More and more often, in certain
specific situations, an officer must act not only as a
“soldier-specialist”, but also as a critically thinking
“soldier-citizen”, as well as “soldier-diplomat”. In
this context, the officer’s studies and military training
must be focused on the officer’s ability to understand
changes in the environment and adequately assess
them in order to solve the relevant problem or
challenge in a rational and effective way.
931
The training of officers should be focused on
flexibility, their thinking should be based on the
selection of alternative methods and means (variants
of actions), which should be used to influence the
military, conceptual, moral, and psychological power
of enemies, by attacking them under favorable
conditions. This allows to achieve the best battle
results with fewer resources so that smaller forces
could suppress larger ones.
Of course, at a household level, a stereotype has
emerged that soldiers are actors who carry out orders
rather than ask questions. Someone would say that
war is such a practical and dynamic thing that it
makes no sense to spend time thinking about the war;
when bullets are buzzing around, there is no time to
flip through the books and look in them for answers
how to beat the enemy; a soldier or officer asking
many questions can become a heavy burden or even
an obstacle to achieving the goals set.
However, it is difficult to agree with such a
position, given what a truly dynamic process war is.
War is a changing and, at the same time, constant
phenomenon. In order to understand the interaction
between these two elements, it is important to
constantly research and reflect on the real image of
war and its departure from the ideal image. Since the
restoration of independence, Lithuanian soldiers have
participated in many international missions in Bosnia,
Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan, off the coast of Somalia,
and in Mali. What principles and ideas were used to
prepare for these missions? Why were some ideas or
military doctrines used while others not? Why were
the conceptual principles offered by certain countries
used? Why is the content of the Lithuanian military
doctrine and other similar documents the way it is?
What is the origin of ideas reflected therein? Some of
the answers are already known. Many best practices
have been adopted from Allies in the West.
The training of officers is a tradition of the British
military thought adopted by NATO. The military in
Lithuania has been newly created. The best western
tradition and models have been adopted and applied.
Thus, in fact, we can tell our colleagues abroad about
the effectiveness of the models they have developed
[16].
The crisis in Ukraine and the aggressive foreign
policy of the Russian Federation has changed the
stagnant attitude of politicians towards national
defense both in Lithuania and in the international
arena and has led to increased appropriations in this
area [4]. The agreement of the political parties to
fulfill the commitments made by the NATO Alliance
on defense financing has stimulated the processes of
modernization of the army that has been underway
since 2016 and has received a great deal of public
attention and discussion about the validity of one or
another purchase in light of existing geopolitical
situation. The problem becomes deeper when the
people involved focus on the acquisition of new
equipment, and the importance of training a qualified
commander seems to be forgotten. The regulated
responsibility of Naval Forces is the training of
personnel as a key and critical resource. Without a
properly trained naval officer, the most advanced
technology is worthless.
The army is a hierarchical organization based on
discipline, patriotism, national and military values.
Its units must be headed by officers who are best-
trained leaders, who know how to point in the
necessary direction, explain the goal, clearly define
tasks, and who are able to persuade and motivate.
The main values and qualities of a naval officer are
patriotism, loyalty, commitment, honesty, courage,
respect, honor, and extensive professional knowledge
related to the old maritime traditions, high culture of
communication, and opportunities to participate in
international exercises in both hemispheres of the
Earth. The naval officer is a leading personality
precisely in terms of these values and qualities.
In his article “Separate but Equal a Look at
Officer Training in the U.S. Navy and Merchant
Marine” [6], John Hafner notes that a destroyer and a
tanker is based on the same principle of being on the
water, however, the internal organization, purpose,
specificity, preparation, and responsibility covered by
the ships are separated by an invisible border. Unlike
a merchant fleet, the main goal of the U.S. Navy is to
prepare an officer according to his/her competencies
and professional knowledge for him/her to become
optimally suited for service both onboard and ashore.
Considering the wide range of professional
knowledge required, U.S. naval officers are rotating
their line of service from direct command of the
ship’s crew to the operational and strategic planning
sector ashore, gradually moving up the career ladder.
A warship is one of the most complicated ships in
terms of construction and specifics.
Therefore, the commander of the ship is not
required to take care of the propeller rotation. He/she
is responsible for the proper management of the crew
(specialists), its motivation, appropriate decision-
making in an emergency situation, and successful
completion of a tactical or operational task.
Warfare is one of the most complex activities.
Soldiers often have to deal with very difficult
conditions, which pose a threat to their lives and
health, endure heavy physical exertion, and
experience various psychological and spiritual shocks
and challenges. Naval officers must be particularly
prepared well to operate in critical conditions
because the mental state, behavior, and
combativeness of soldiers depend on the
psychological condition of the officers. An officer is
required to have a clear and strong civic and moral
position and to know his/her professional field well
[15].
For a naval officer to be well-prepared, it is
necessary to organize his/her personal strategic self-
development based on a comprehensive approach to
his/her personality. The main areas of organization of
the strategic self-development of the naval officer in
accordance with his/her personality levels, i.e.
physical, psychological, and spiritual, are presented
in Table 1.
932
Table 1. Organization of strategic self-development of naval
officers
_______________________________________________
MAIN AREAS PERSONALITY LEVELS
Physical Mental Spiritual
_______________________________________________
1 Moral position + +
2 Flexible thinking + +
3 Physical / mental health + + +
4 Education / training + + +
5 Wide subject knowledge + +
6 Psychological resilience + + +
_______________________________________________
The personal strategic self-development of naval
officers, including all aforementioned personality
levels, can deliver the expected results related to the
challenges of military activities.
British historian David G. Morgan-Owen notes in
his article “Approaching a Fork in the Road:
Professional Education and Military Learning” [11]
that currently in light of the geopolitical situation
military service is gaining routine functions, and the
curriculum in academies often stagnates. It is
appropriate to highlight that science, as well as
knowledge, is a changing and dynamic process that
must evolve and change along with the environment.
Recently, the ranks of military academies have been
supplemented by young people focused on science;
nevertheless, they are far from warfare and physical
discipline. Of course, on the one hand, it is important
to take into account the need for cadets to link their
future plans to the civilian sector, if necessary. On the
other hand, we should not forget about the natural
purpose of a military academy to train patriotic,
strong-willed, and psychologically strong officers as
leaders of the future, based on the lessons learned in
the past.
2.2 Transition period for the training of Lithuanian naval
officers
In 1991, Order No. 352 of the Minister of National
Defense of the Republic of Lithuania “On the
formation of a Coast Guard Team of the Border
Guard Service” legalized the subordination of the
Naval Forces to the Border Guard Service. An Expert
Council was set up, and one of its tasks was to create
a System for training personnel for Naval Forces
(which is still in operation) and submit it to the
Ministry of National Defense. According to this
system, specialists are trained at Kaunas University of
Technology and Klaipeda University. Military
education and officers’ degrees are awarded after
receiving additional training in Lithuanian or foreign
military academies [9].
In 19922014, the Lithuanian Naval Forces had the
opportunity to train its naval officers at foreign
military academies in Western Europe (Sweden,
Norway, Germany, and Denmark) and the USA based
on the NATO Partnership for Peace program. The
Partnership for Peace is a program of practical
bilateral cooperation between individual Euro-
Atlantic partner countries and NATO. It allows
partners to build up an individual relationship with
NATO and choose their own priorities for
cooperation. All European nations that participate in
the North Atlantic Cooperation Council and those
that take part in the Organization for Security and
Co-operation in Europe and wanted to cooperate
with NATO were invited to join the Partnership for
Peace program. The goal of the Partnership for Peace
program is to strengthen stability and security across
Europe. The invitation to participate in the program
was accepted by 30 countries [14].
The strategic objective of the program is to
support the member states in rebuilding their armed
forces and preparing qualified command personnel
for service, including the newly formed Naval Forces.
The following NATO members have offered their
support in training naval officers for the Lithuanian
Naval Forces: the USA with a successful U.S. Naval
Academy in Annapolis (its activity is based on the
motto “From Knowledge, Seapower”), Norway,
Germany, and Denmark, represented by the Royal
Danish Naval Academy, which has developed the
oldest European model for training naval officers,
and Sweden, which is neutral towards NATO. In
addition, allied naval partners have closely worked
with the Lithuanian Naval Forces by training
Lithuanian naval officers, actively supporting
warship acquisition projects, and leading major
exercises in the Baltic Sea, e.g., “Northern Coasts”,
“Baltops”, etc., in which the warships of the
Lithuanian Naval Forces have been successfully
participating for many years [18].
In 2004, the Republic of Lithuania became a
member of NATO, and because of that, the
Lithuanian Naval Forces lost the opportunity to train
its officers in Western European naval academies. As
a result, the current transition period of the Naval
Forces has reduced the scope of not only the adequate
preparation for equal participation in international
exercises and operations with Allies, but also the
development of leadership qualities and values of the
commander, which had been previously successfully
developed at naval academies of Sweden, Norway,
Denmark, Germany, and the USA. Several
generations of naval officers for the Lithuanian Naval
Forces were trained there.
In addition, Lithuanian naval officers notice that
every year the number of junior officers is increased
by insufficiently trained officers lacking the basics of
naval warfare, and it is also questionable whether
they would be able to respond adequately and
responsibly during a military conflict or in an
emergency situation in the context of the previously-
mentioned changes in the social environment of the
military profession and warfare in general.
Naval officers are trained for the Lithuanian Naval
Forces in accordance with the Order No. V-1229 of
the Commander of the Lithuanian Armed Forces
issued in 2012 and its amendment No. V-64 issued in
2015. Instructors and professionals included in the
junior officer commander training program of the
Naval Forces organize military training of naval
reserve officers, collaborating with the Lithuanian
Maritime Academy where the training of naval
officers for the Lithuanian Naval Forces has been
organized since 1993.
The greatest burden of naval officer training falls
on the Lithuanian Maritime Academy where students
of the Lithuanian Military Academy can study under
933
contract in order to prepare for work in the Naval
Forces. These are academies having different
purposes. The Lithuanian Military Academy is a
university, and its officer training program is
characterized by synergy, i.e. cadets are studying
under the bachelor’s study program and develop the
qualities of a leader in parallel. The Lithuanian
Military Academy is based on the science of warfare
and pursues that the Lithuanian Armed Forces are
characterized by the officers who are tactically and
technically proficient, confident, and able to make
appropriate decisions in critical circumstances.
Students of the Lithuanian Military Academy, who
have chosen maritime studies, can study at the
Lithuanian Maritime Academy, which is a non-
university type of school focused on civil study
programs, such as Marine Navigation, Marine
Engineering, Marine Transport Logistics Technology,
Port and Shipping Management, etc. Students of the
Lithuanian Maritime Academy have an opportunity
to participate in the junior officer commander
training.
In accordance with the Order No. V-64 of the
Commander of the Lithuanian Armed Forces issued
in 2015, persons who wish to participate in the junior
officer commander training must have expressed a
wish to participate in the training in writing and be
suitable for the training in accordance with the
procedures established by law. The staff of the junior
officer commander training organizes the selection of
candidates for the training in cooperation with the
National Defense Volunteer Force.
The main purpose of the junior officer commander
training is to provide future reserve officers with the
theoretical knowledge and practical skills necessary
to lead the combat unit. However, the junior officer
commander training program of Naval Forces is
based on the principle of training a land reserve
officer in accordance with the subjects taught, such as
tactics, weapons, shooting, military engineering,
communications, and military topography.
The Lithuanian Maritime Academy is training
leading seafarers, i.e. marine navigators, marine
engineers, and marine electrical and electronic
engineers, in accordance with the conventions of the
International Maritime Organization and the
International Standard for Qualifications. As it has
been mentioned, the junior officer commander
training organized at the Lithuanian Maritime
Academy acts as an additional choice of the students
who, being participants of the junior officer
commander training, can study only introductory
warfare subjects. In addition, if they complete the
junior officer commander training successfully, they
rarely associate their professional future with the
Naval Forces.
The requirements established for naval officers are
very high. The Order No. V-91of the Commander of
the Lithuanian Naval Forces issued in 2017 indicates
that a commander of a combat unit performs the
duties of the officer in charge of a navigational watch
and must be able to direct all operations of the ship,
e.g., naval activities related to a helicopter, perform
tactical maneuvering in a combination of ships, make
a recognized maritime picture, etc. in accordance
with the procedures approved by NATO.
Therefore, it can be assumed that future
commanders of combat units cannot be optimally
prepared for the duties of a watch officer without the
preparation that includs at least the completion of the
course that usually forms the core of introductory
programs of foreign military academies, including
comprehensive training covering the needs of
modern warfare. A strategic decision on more
effective training of Lithuanian naval officers in such
a transition period should integrate comprehensive
training, by defining how to strengthen the
connection between their preparation and the
Alliance’s partners (Table 2).
Table 2. Optimal training of naval officers
_______________________________________________
COLLABORATION WITH THE ALLIANCE’S PARTNERS
_______________________________________________
1 Updating existing training programs
2 Coordinating them with Western military academies
3 Providing the possibility of joint programs
_______________________________________________
The above headlines and greater diversity with a
more flexible approach to the professional training of
naval officers would help to ensure optimal training
in light of the current Lithuanian context.
3 CONCLUSIONS
In summarizing the problematical analysis of a naval
officer as a leading personality from a strategic point
of view, it can be stated that:
The changes, such as the absence of a clear border
between the front line of action and the back area,
expression of war as a changing and, at the same
time, constant process, and changes in the social
environment of the officer profession, when the
challenges are not always purely physically
military in nature but also diplomatic and
psychological, require a high level of military
training for naval officers, who must be in a
proper moral and civic position, have a wide
range of specific knowledge, and be characterized
by critical and flexible thinking, anticipation of
alternative options, understanding of changes in
the social environment, and appropriate response
to them;
Considering the transition period for the training
of Lithuanian naval officers at non-foreign
military academies, their professional training in
light of the aforementioned problems, changes,
and needs, should be strengthened by
collaboration with the Alliance’s partners, by
updating existing training programs and
coordinating them with Western military
academies, which have a long tradition of training
naval officers. It is appropriate to provide the
possibility of joint programs in order to
adequately participate in joint exercises with
Alliance’s partners in the Baltic Sea.
934
REFERENCES
[1] Bohnert M. Innere Führung auf dem Prüfstand.
Norderstedt: Books on Demand, 2017.
[2] Bouchard J. Think like a Black Belt. New York: San Chi
Publishing, 2010.
[3] Brake T. Leadership development: learning from the
U.S. Navy. Training, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 20-21, 2018.
[4] Dykyi E. Hibridinis Rusijos karas: Ukrainos patirtis Baltijos
šalims. Vilnius: Generolo Jono Žemaičio Lietuvos karo
akademija, 2016.
[5] Genzelis B., Žigaras F., Kazlauskaitė-Markelienė R.,
Petrauskaitė A. Šiuolaikinės visuomenės vertybinės
orientacijos ir Lietuvos kariuomenė. Vilnius: Generolo Jono
Žemaičio Lietuvos karo akademija, 2008.
[6] Hafner J. Separate but equal a Look at Officer training
in The U.S. Navy and Merchant Marine. gCaptain,
https://gcaptain.com, 2017.
[7] Hammouti-Reinke N. Ich diene Deutschland: Ein Plädoyer
für die Bundeswehr und warum sie sich ändern muss.
Hamburg: Rowohlt, 2019.
[8] Kanapeckaitė R. Psichologinio atsparumo ugdymas
rengiant karininkus. Šiuolaikinės visuomenės ugdymo
veiksniai, Vol. 3, pp. 183-191, 2018.
[9] Kažerskas R., Brencius A., Vitkauskas A. Karinės jūrų
pajėgos: 1990/1991 metai. Karinių jūrų pajėgų istorijos
metraštis, pp. 19-23, 2012.
[10] Mcbride S. BRNC: A complete guide to preparation for
Royal Naval Officer Training at Britannia Royal Naval
College. Kent: How2become Ltd, 2016.
[11] Morgan-Owen D.G. Approaching a fork in the road:
professional education and military learning. War on the
Rocks, https://warontherocks.com, 2018.
[12] Neudeck G., Schröder H. Das kleine Buch von der
Marine. Bremen: Maritime press, 2012.
[13] North Atlantic Treaty Organization. NATO Member
Countries, https://www.nato.int, 2018.
[14] North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Partnership for
Peace programme, https://www.nato.int, 2017.
[15] Puzinavičius B. Karininko asmenybės ugdymo ir
saviugdos problemos tarpukario nepriklausomoje
Lietuvoje. Karinis rengimas ir ugdymas Lietuvoje, pp. 130-
141, 2007.
[16] Šlekys D. Mąslaus vyčio beieškant: lietuviškos karinės
minties raida ir būklė po nepriklausomybės atkūrimo (1990
2014). Vilnius: Generolo Jono Žemaičio Lietuvos karo
akademija, 2015.
[17] Trumpickienė M., Kalvaitienė G. Motyvacinės sistemos
tęsti ar rinktis profesinę karo tarnybą Lietuvos
kariuomenės karinėse jūrų pajėgose tyrimas. Šiuolaikinės
visuomenės ugdymo veiksniai, Vol. 4, pp. 125-141, 2019.
[18] U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa. Baltops,
https://www.c6f.navy.mil, 2019.
[19] Vego M. Maritime Strategy and Sea Control. New York:
Routledge, 2017.
[20] Vego M. Operational Warfare at Sea: Theory and Practice.
New York: Routledge, 2017.
[21] Vileikie E., Pocienė A., Aleknevičienė J. Motyvacija
tarnauti Lietuvos kariuomenėje. Vilnius: Generolo Jono
Žemaičio Lietuvos karo akademija, 2015.
[22] Willink J., Babin L. Extreme Ownership: How U.S. Navy
SEALs Lead and Win. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2017.
[23] Žigaras F. Lietuvos kariuomenės karininkų rengimo ir
jų kvalifikacijos kėlimo raida (19902015). Šiuolaikinės
visuomenės ugdymo veiksniai, Vol. 1, pp. 57-91.